Rohrich Rod J, Gosman Amanda A, Brown Spencer A, Tonadapu Prasanthi, Foster Barbara
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nancy Lee and Perry R. Bass Advanced Plastic Surgery and Wound-Healing Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Dec;114(7):1724-33; discussion 1734-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142480.27748.9e.
The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.
本次调查的目的是评估乳房缩小技术的当前趋势,并比较与传统切口技术和有限切口技术相关的满意率及并发症。2002年9月,一项乳房缩小调查被发送给美国美容整形外科学会的1500名会员;554名会员回复了调查。问题引出分类答案,并使用卡方检验和两个比例的比较对数据进行评估。结果显示,56%的受访者仅使用下蒂和 Wise 模式技术,而6.9%的受访者仅使用有限切口技术。有限切口组和传统切口组的医生满意度在1(不满意)至5(非常满意)的量表上均评为4。有限切口组的患者满意度评为4,传统切口组评为5。每位外科医生的患者满意度差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。传统组报告的并发症发生率低于有限切口组(p < 0.05)。对传统切口组与有限切口组最常见的并发症进行了比较。还分析了实践概况、抽脂以及对乳房手术未来变化的看法。大多数外科医生报告说,他们预计不会改变自己的做法以适应有限切口技术的进步;然而,89%的人报告说,新的有限切口技术和抽脂术是会持续存在的趋势。