Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Sana Kliniken Duesseldorf GmbH, Graeulinger Strasse 120, 40625, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Faculty of Health, University of Witten-Herdecke (UWH), Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;45(5):2061-2074. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02351-y. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
INTRODUCTION: Reduction mammaplasty in patients with gigantomastia is challenging. The Double-Unit technique with a Superomedio-Central pedicle and inverted-T incision is the standard technique for reduction mammaplasty in our clinic. The aim of this study was to review our approach in cases with gigantomastia in comparison with the current literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 01/2011 to 12/2017, we performed 831 reduction mammaplasties in 630 patients. The Double-Unit Superomedio-Central (DUS) pedicle and inverted-T incision was implemented as a standard procedure for gigantomastia. Patient demographics and the outcome parameters complication rate, patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result, nipple sensibility, and surgical revision rate were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In 37 patients, 55 reduction mammaplasties were performed with more than 1000 g per breast. Mean resection weight was 1311 g on right side and 1289 g on left side. Mean age was 52.5 years, mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m, mean sternal-notch-to-nipple distance was 38.3 cm. A free NAC graft was necessary in four breasts. Overall complication rate was 14.5%; secondary surgical revision rate was 12.7%. 91% of the patients were "very satisfied" and "satisfied" with the aesthetic result. Nipple sensibility was rated "high" and "medium" in 83%. CONCLUSION: The Double-Unit technique with a Superomedio-Central pedicle and inverted-T incision is very effective to achieve volume reduction and aesthetically pleasing reproducible results with a low complication rate in cases with gigantomastia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of Evidence This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
引言:巨乳症患者的乳房缩小术具有挑战性。在我们的诊所,采用带中央-超侧蒂和倒 T 形切口的双单位技术是乳房缩小术的标准技术。本研究的目的是回顾我们在巨乳症病例中的方法,并与当前文献进行比较。
患者和方法:从 2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月,我们在 630 名患者中进行了 831 例乳房缩小术。采用双单位中央-超侧蒂(DUS)和倒 T 形切口作为巨乳症的标准手术方法。获取并回顾性分析患者人口统计学数据和结果参数(并发症发生率、患者对美学效果的满意度、乳头感觉和手术修正率)。
结果:在 37 名患者中,55 例乳房缩小术每侧乳房切除重量超过 1000 克。右侧切除重量的平均值为 1311 克,左侧为 1289 克。平均年龄为 52.5 岁,平均 BMI 为 32.8kg/m,胸骨切迹到乳头的距离平均为 38.3 厘米。四例乳房需要游离乳头皮瓣。总并发症发生率为 14.5%;二次手术修正率为 12.7%。91%的患者对美学效果“非常满意”和“满意”。乳头感觉评为“高”和“中”的比例为 83%。
结论:采用带中央-超侧蒂和倒 T 形切口的双单位技术可非常有效地减少巨乳症患者的乳房体积,获得美观且可重复的效果,并发症发生率低。
证据水平:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学分级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017-10
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017-12
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015-6
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-10
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-8-4
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020-1-22
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018-12-14
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018-9-20
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018-6
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017-12
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017-10