Hantschke Markus, Bastian Boris C, LeBoit Philip E
Dermatopathologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Dec;28(12):1621-5. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200412000-00011.
The distinction between melanoma and its most important simulant, Spitz nevus, is usually made on microscopically. We point out "consumption of the epidermis" (COE) as an additional diagnostic criterion. We defined COE as thinning of the epidermis with attenuation of the basal and suprabasal layers and loss of rete ridges in areas of direct contact with neoplastic melanocytes. We analyzed 102 unequivocal melanomas and 125 unequivocal Spitz nevi for the presence of COE. COE had not been used in arriving at the diagnosis of these cases because we were unaware of the criterion at the time that the cases were first evaluated. COE was found in 88 of 102 (86%) of melanomas but only 12 of 125 (9.6%) of Spitz nevi (P < 0.001). We then looked for COE in an independent set of 61 ambiguous melanocytic lesions with overlapping histopathologic features that could not be classified unequivocally as Spitz nevus or melanoma. The cases were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for aberration patterns suggesting a benign or a malignant process, based on previous studies. COE was found in only 6 of 42 (14%) of the ambiguous cases in which CGH suggested a benign process and 14 of 19 (74%) of the ambiguous cases in which CGH suggested melanoma (P < 0.001). Our data suggest that COE is a useful criterion in the evaluation of melanocytic neoplasms. Because COE was frequently found at the edges of ulcers in the majority of ulcerated melanomas, the thinning of the epidermis in COE may represent an early phase of ulceration. This may prove to be important in distinguishing ulceration due to an effect of the tumor from ulceration due to trauma, which would be expected not to have the same prognostic import. Future studies are required to analyze the prognostic value of COE itself.
黑色素瘤与其最重要的模拟物——斯皮茨痣之间的区别通常在显微镜下进行判断。我们指出“表皮消耗”(COE)可作为一项额外的诊断标准。我们将COE定义为与肿瘤性黑素细胞直接接触区域的表皮变薄,伴有基底层和基上层变薄以及 rete 嵴消失。我们分析了102例明确的黑色素瘤和125例明确的斯皮茨痣,以确定是否存在COE。在对这些病例进行诊断时未使用COE,因为在首次评估这些病例时我们并不知晓该标准。在102例黑色素瘤中有88例(86%)发现了COE,但在125例斯皮茨痣中只有12例(9.6%)发现了COE(P<0.001)。然后,我们在一组独立的61例具有重叠组织病理学特征的模糊黑素细胞性病变中寻找COE,这些病变无法明确分类为斯皮茨痣或黑色素瘤。根据先前的研究,通过比较基因组杂交(CGH)分析这些病例的畸变模式,以提示良性或恶性过程。在CGH提示为良性过程的42例模糊病例中,只有6例(14%)发现了COE,而在CGH提示为黑色素瘤的19例模糊病例中有14例(74%)发现了COE(P<0.001)。我们的数据表明,COE在黑素细胞性肿瘤的评估中是一项有用的标准。由于在大多数溃疡性黑色素瘤中,COE经常出现在溃疡边缘,因此COE中的表皮变薄可能代表溃疡的早期阶段。这在区分肿瘤引起的溃疡和创伤引起的溃疡方面可能具有重要意义,因为创伤引起的溃疡预计不会有相同的预后意义。未来需要进行研究来分析COE本身的预后价值。