Suppr超能文献

遗嘱能力回顾性挑战中的精神问题

Psychiatric issues in retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity.

作者信息

Shulman Kenneth I, Cohen Carole A, Hull Ian

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;20(1):63-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.1257.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Challenges to Wills on the basis of lack of testamentary capacity are likely to increase due to a combination of economic factors, high prevalence of mental disorders in old age and the complexity of many modern families. Geriatric psychiatrists and other experts will be asked to provide expert assessment of the testamentary capacity of individuals whose Wills are being challenged retrospectively. The traditional criteria described in the Banks vs Goodfellow case have been held as the standard for testamentary capacity. However, these criteria may not be comprehensive enough for the coming generation of expert assessors.

METHOD

The literature and selected international case law relevant to testamentary capacity were reviewed. Particular focus is placed on the conceptual and empirical approaches to the assessment of complex capacities that may inform the development of specific legal standards. In addition, 25 consecutive medico-legal reports on retrospective testamentary capacity were analyzed according to co-morbid medical and psychiatric disorders as well as psychosocial and behavioural variables. Illustrative case vignettes are included.

RESULTS

The typical profile for retrospective challenges to testamentary capacity included a radical change from a previous Will (72%), where undue influence was alleged (56%), in a testator with no biological children (52%), who executed the Will less than a year prior to death (48%). Co-morbid conditions were dementia (40%), alcohol abuse (28%) and other neurological/psychiatric conditions (28%).

CONCLUSIONS

While Banks vs Goodfellow continues to provide a sound basis for assessing testamentary (task-specific) capacity, the complexity and subtlety of the issues reflected in these cases highlight the need to go beyond the traditional criteria and assess situation-specific factors. Expert assessors need to determine whether the testator appreciated the consequences of executing or changing a Will, especially when there has been a radical change in the context of a complex or conflictual family environment. Empirical studies addressing the cognitive functions relevant to testamentary capacity and the development of legal standards based on a competency construct may also help to inform retrospective capacity assessments.

摘要

背景

由于经济因素、老年精神障碍的高患病率以及许多现代家庭的复杂性等多种因素的综合作用,基于缺乏遗嘱能力而对遗嘱提出质疑的情况可能会增加。老年精神病医生和其他专家将被要求对遗嘱受到追溯性质疑的个人的遗嘱能力提供专家评估。在班克斯诉古德费洛案中描述的传统标准一直被视为遗嘱能力的标准。然而,这些标准对于未来一代的专家评估者来说可能不够全面。

方法

对与遗嘱能力相关的文献和选定的国际判例法进行了回顾。特别关注评估复杂能力的概念性和实证性方法,这些方法可能为制定具体的法律标准提供参考。此外,根据合并的医学和精神疾病以及社会心理和行为变量,对25份关于追溯遗嘱能力的连续法医学报告进行了分析。还包括了说明性的案例 vignettes。

结果

遗嘱能力追溯性质疑的典型情况包括与之前遗嘱的重大变化(72%),其中被指控存在不当影响(56%),立遗嘱人没有亲生孩子(52%),且在去世前不到一年立下遗嘱(48%)。合并病症包括痴呆(40%)、酒精滥用(28%)和其他神经/精神疾病(28%)。

结论

虽然班克斯诉古德费洛案继续为评估遗嘱(特定任务)能力提供了坚实的基础,但这些案例中反映的问题的复杂性和微妙性凸显了超越传统标准并评估具体情况因素的必要性。专家评估者需要确定立遗嘱人是否理解执行或更改遗嘱的后果,特别是在复杂或冲突的家庭环境中发生重大变化时。针对与遗嘱能力相关的认知功能的实证研究以及基于能力构建的法律标准的制定,也可能有助于为追溯能力评估提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验