Nagahara Akihito, Miwa Hiroto, Kawabe Masato, Kurosawa Akihiko, Asaoka Daisuke, Hojo Mariko, Iijima Katsuyori, Terai Takeshi, Ohkusa Toshifumi, Miyazaki Akihisa, Sato Nobuhiro
Department of Internal Medicine, Juntendo Koshigaya Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov;39(11):1051-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-004-1443-5.
Recent studies have reported that proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/amoxicillin (A) metronidazole (M) therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection provides a sufficient cure rate in Japan in patients who have failed first-line treatment with PPI/amoxicillin and clarithromycin (AC). To validate the efficacy of this regimen as second-line therapy, our experience with second-line treatment using a PPI/AM regimen was reviewed.
We analyzed data on 151 patients who had been prescribed a 10-day PPI/AM re-treatment regimen after eradication failure of 1 to 2 weeks' first-line PPI/AC therapy. The PPI/AM regimen was given according to results of susceptibility testing (S+) in 31 patients. The group that had undergone susceptibility testing was further divided into two subgroups according to dosage: standard dose of omeprazole (O)/AM (n = 11) and double dose of lansoprazole (L)/AM (n = 20). The PPI/AM regimen was given without susceptibility testing (S-) to 120 patients. These patients were also divided into two subgroups according to whether they received omeprazole or lansoprazole: OAM (n = 61) and LAM (n = 59). Cure rates and adverse effects in each group were analyzed.
The intention-to-treat (ITT)-based cure rate with/without susceptibility testing was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-99%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 80%-93%), respectively (not significant [NS]). The ITT-based cure rate in S+/S- for OAM and S+/S- for LAM was 90.9% (95% CI, 59%-100%)/82% (95% CI, 70%-91%), and 95% (95% CI, 75%-100%)/93.2% (95% CI, 84%-98%), respectively (NS). Adverse effects were seen in 26.3% and 32.5% of patients in the OAM group and the LAM group, respectively (NS).
The 10-day PPI/AM re-treatment regimen is safe and effective, suggesting its usefulness as second-line treatment in Japan in patients who have failed initial treatment with the PPI/AC regimen.
最近的研究报告称,在日本,对于一线使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)/阿莫西林(A)和克拉霉素(AC)治疗失败的幽门螺杆菌感染患者,采用PPI/阿莫西林(A)/甲硝唑(M)疗法可提供足够的治愈率。为验证该方案作为二线治疗的疗效,我们回顾了使用PPI/AM方案进行二线治疗的经验。
我们分析了151例患者的数据,这些患者在接受1至2周的一线PPI/AC治疗根除失败后,接受了为期10天的PPI/AM再治疗方案。根据药敏试验结果(S+),对31例患者给予PPI/AM方案。根据剂量,将接受药敏试验的组进一步分为两个亚组:标准剂量奥美拉唑(O)/AM(n = 11)和双倍剂量兰索拉唑(L)/AM(n = 20)。对120例患者在未进行药敏试验(S-)的情况下给予PPI/AM方案。这些患者也根据是否接受奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑分为两个亚组:OAM(n = 61)和LAM(n = 59)。分析了每组的治愈率和不良反应。
基于意向性治疗(ITT)的有/无药敏试验的治愈率分别为93.5%(95%置信区间[CI],79%-99%)和87.5%(95%CI,80%-93%)(无显著性差异[NS])。OAM的S+/S-组和LAM的S+/S-组基于ITT的治愈率分别为90.9%(95%CI,59%-100%)/82%(95%CI,7%-9%)和95%(95%CI,75%-100%)/93.2%(95%CI,84%-98%)(无显著性差异)。OAM组和LAM组分别有26.3%和32.5%的患者出现不良反应(无显著性差异)。
为期10天的PPI/AM再治疗方案安全有效,表明其在日本对初始PPI/AC方案治疗失败患者作为二线治疗的有效性。