Suppr超能文献

在根除幽门螺杆菌的三联疗法中用阿奇霉素替代克拉霉素:一项随机临床试验。

Replacement of clarithromycin with azithromycin in triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Khoshnood A, Hakimi P, Salman-Roghani H, Reza Mirjalili M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2014 Jun 15;7(2):254-9. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eradication of helicobacter pylori is important for treatment of GU but an ideal regimen is not available. HP is resistant to metronidazole and clarithromycin. Clarithromycin is expensive and is not available in under developing countries. This study aimed to compare two regimens containing clarithromycin or azithromycin.

METHODS

Totally, seventy-eight patients with GU (confirmed with endoscopy) and infection of HP (Confirmed by Rapid Urease Test (RUT)) were allocated to one of the groups of study (35 participants in each group). Two weeks regimen of Clarithromycin (2×500 mg) + Amoxicillin (2×1 gr) + omeprazole (2×20 mg) was administered for group A of patients while group B got a 10 days regimen of Azithromycin (1×250 mg) + 14 days Amoxicillin (2×1 gr) + omeprazole (2×20 mg). At the end of the treatment course, the patients were evaluated according to the side effects of the drugs. In addition, two months after the end of therapy, patients underwent endoscopy and biopsy to evaluate HP eradication.

RESULTS

After two weeks, the side effects of the drug were: Nausea 8 patients in group A and 7 patients in group B, Diarrhea 2 patients in group A, 3 patients in group B and vomiting 2 patients in group A, 3 patients in group B. There were no serious side effects in any group. Eradication rate in group A was 82.9% (based on per protocol analysis (PPA)) and 84.6 % (intention to treat (ITT)). In group B, eradication rate was 77.1 % (PPA) and 79.5 % (ITT) (P=0.55).

CONCLUSION

Based on our study results, azithromycin can be used in HP eradication regimen because of its similar efficacy to clarithromycin but also have lower cost, side effects and resistance.

摘要

背景

根除幽门螺杆菌对胃溃疡的治疗很重要,但尚无理想的治疗方案。幽门螺杆菌对甲硝唑和克拉霉素耐药。克拉霉素价格昂贵,在发展中国家难以获得。本研究旨在比较含克拉霉素或阿奇霉素的两种治疗方案。

方法

总共78例胃溃疡患者(经内镜确诊)和幽门螺杆菌感染患者(经快速尿素酶试验(RUT)确诊)被分配到其中一组进行研究(每组35名参与者)。A组患者接受为期两周的克拉霉素(2×500毫克)+阿莫西林(2×1克)+奥美拉唑(2×20毫克)治疗方案,而B组患者接受为期10天的阿奇霉素(1×250毫克)+为期14天的阿莫西林(2×1克)+奥美拉唑(2×20毫克)治疗方案。在治疗疗程结束时,根据药物副作用对患者进行评估。此外,在治疗结束两个月后,患者接受内镜检查和活检以评估幽门螺杆菌的根除情况。

结果

两周后,药物副作用情况如下:A组恶心8例,B组7例;A组腹泻2例,B组3例;A组呕吐2例,B组3例。两组均无严重副作用。A组的根除率按符合方案分析(PPA)为82.9%,意向性分析(ITT)为84.6%。B组的根除率按PPA为77.1%,按ITT为79.5%(P = 0.55)。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,阿奇霉素可用于幽门螺杆菌根除方案,因为它与克拉霉素疗效相似,但成本更低、副作用更少且耐药性更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3f9/4197489/8fb7a6523a9a/JMedLife-07-254-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验