Ibáñez Luisa, Vidal Xavier, Ballarín Elena, Laporte Joan-Ramon
Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Institut Català de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jan;60(11):821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0836-y. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
Reported estimates of the risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizol have varied by several orders of magnitude. We assessed this association in a large database for the surveillance of blood dyscrasias.
Since 1980, all laboratory units of haematology in a defined area (3.3-4.1x10(6) inhabitants) contribute to the ascertainment of all cases of agranulocytosis meeting strict diagnostic criteria. These cases of patients with agranulocytosis and sex-, age-, hospital- and date-matched controls were interviewed using a structured questionnaire about previous drug exposures, and relative risks were calculated for several categories of exposure to metamizol.
After a total follow-up of 78.73x10(6) person-years, 273 community cases of agranulocytosis had been found--of which 96 were excluded for various reasons and 177 were included in the case-control analysis--and were compared with 586 matched controls. Thirty cases of agranulocytosis (16.9%) and nine controls (1.5%) had been exposed to metamizol during the week before the index day. The adjusted relative risk was 25.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.4-79.1], and the attributable incidence was 0.56 (0.4-0.8) cases per million inhabitants and per year. The risk disappeared after more than 10 days since the last dose of metamizol, and it increased with duration of use. Those with agranulocytosis exposed to metamizol had taken the drug for longer periods than the exposed controls. Compared with the cases recently reported from Sweden, the duration of use of metamizol by our exposed cases was substantially shorter, and the use of concomitant medications potentially causing agranulocytosis was lower.
In our milieu, agranulocytosis attributable to metamizol is rare. Geographical disparities in its risk estimate can be partly explained by differences in its patterns of use, in terms of dose, duration and concomitant medications.
已报道的与安乃近相关的粒细胞缺乏症风险估计值相差几个数量级。我们在一个用于监测血液系统疾病的大型数据库中评估了这种关联。
自1980年以来,在一个特定区域(330万至410万居民)内的所有血液学实验室单位都参与了符合严格诊断标准的所有粒细胞缺乏症病例的确诊工作。使用结构化问卷对这些粒细胞缺乏症患者以及性别、年龄、医院和日期匹配的对照进行访谈,了解既往药物暴露情况,并计算安乃近几类暴露情况的相对风险。
在总计7873万人年的随访后,共发现273例社区粒细胞缺乏症病例——其中96例因各种原因被排除,177例纳入病例对照分析——并与586例匹配对照进行比较。30例粒细胞缺乏症病例(16.9%)和9例对照(1.5%)在索引日前一周内曾暴露于安乃近。调整后的相对风险为25.8[95%置信区间(CI),8.4 - 79.1],归因发病率为每百万居民每年0.56(0.4 - 0.8)例。自最后一剂安乃近服用超过10天后风险消失,且风险随使用时间延长而增加。暴露于安乃近的粒细胞缺乏症患者服用该药物的时间比暴露对照更长。与瑞典最近报道的病例相比,我们的暴露病例安乃近的使用时间明显更短,且可能导致粒细胞缺乏症的合并用药使用情况更低。
在我们所处的环境中,可以归因于安乃近的粒细胞缺乏症很少见。其风险估计的地理差异部分可由其使用模式在剂量、持续时间和合并用药方面的差异来解释。