Merrill J T
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Lupus. 2004;13(11):869-76. doi: 10.1191/0961203304lu2026oa.
The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can occur as a primary diagnosis or as a prominent feature of other diseases, predominantly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The 1982 revised criteria for SLE were published prior to many of the studies which have illuminated current understanding of the antiphospholipid syndrome and several current clinical criteria for SLE, when arising from thrombotic damage to different organ systems, could be attributed to APS, leading to some confusion about where the diagnoses of these two disorders should begin and end. Additionally, APS is a significant generalized risk factor for irreversible organ damage and overall mortality in SLE patients and genetic linkages to HLA in APS hold up whether the disorder is primary or linked to SLE. It is increasingly recognized that APS itself is a complex, heterogenous disorder, involving a spectrum of autoantibodies to phospholipid-binding proteins, many of which have known coagulation-regulating functions. Although the combination of more than one antiphospholipid-related antibody might indicate a more severe phenotype, it is not suggested here that additive criteria for the diagnosis of SLE be accumulated with more than one of these pathologically related autoantibodies. Patients with multiple criteria for APS should be considered to have severe APS but it would be recommended to restrict APS-attributed criteria for SLE to a maximal of two: one immunologic and one clinical. Thus people meeting the Sapporo criteria for APS could gain only a maximum of two criteria for SLE, regardless of how many autoantibodies were detected or how severe the clinical syndrome might be. This would allow manifestations of fullblown APS an appropriate impact towards the diagnosis of SLE without leading to a premature diagnosis of SLE for people who might better be considered to have moderate to severe primary APS.
抗磷脂综合征(APS)可作为主要诊断出现,也可作为其他疾病(主要是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE))的突出特征出现。1982年修订的SLE标准是在许多阐明当前对抗磷脂综合征理解的研究之前发布的,并且SLE当前的一些临床标准,当源于不同器官系统的血栓性损伤时,可能归因于APS,这导致了关于这两种疾病的诊断从何处开始和结束存在一些混淆。此外,APS是SLE患者不可逆转的器官损伤和总体死亡率的一个重要的全身性危险因素,并且APS与HLA的遗传联系无论该疾病是原发性的还是与SLE相关都成立。人们越来越认识到APS本身是一种复杂的异质性疾病,涉及一系列针对磷脂结合蛋白的自身抗体,其中许多具有已知的凝血调节功能。虽然一种以上抗磷脂相关抗体的组合可能表明更严重的表型,但这里并不建议将SLE诊断的附加标准与一种以上这些病理相关的自身抗体累加。具有多项APS标准的患者应被视为患有严重APS,但建议将归因于APS的SLE标准最多限制为两项:一项免疫学标准和一项临床标准。因此,符合APS的札幌标准的人在SLE诊断中最多只能获得两项标准,无论检测到多少自身抗体或临床综合征有多严重。这将使典型APS的表现对SLE的诊断产生适当的影响,而不会导致对那些可能更适合被认为患有中度至重度原发性APS的人过早诊断为SLE。