Berninger Virginia W, Dunn Alnita, Lin Shin-Ju Cindy, Shimada Shirley
University of Washington, Educational Psychology, Seattle 98195-3600, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;37(6):500-8. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370060401.
Similarities and differences between discursive practitioners and scientist-practitioners are discussed in reference to a variety of issues. The scientist-practitioner's approach to generating and evaluating new knowledge is illustrated with two partnerships: (a) between the University of Washington Multidisciplinary Learning Disability Center and a school district (at-risk first graders in the Los Angeles Unified School District) and (b) between the University of Washington Literacy Trek Project and a local school (at-risk second graders in Seattle public schools). Both partnerships involved mostly children who were English language learners. These partnerships also illustrated how Vygotsky's approach to fostering cognitive development through social interaction can be integrated with that of his pupil Luria, who assessed the neuropsychological processes of the individual mind/brain. The most effective instruction for school-age children, who exhibit biological and cultural diversity, takes into account individual and social-cultural variables.
本文参照一系列问题,探讨了话语实践者与科学家-实践者之间的异同。文中通过两个合作项目阐述了科学家-实践者生成和评估新知识的方法:(a)华盛顿大学多学科学习障碍中心与一个学区(洛杉矶联合学区的高危一年级学生)之间的合作;(b)华盛顿大学读写之旅项目与当地一所学校(西雅图公立学校的高危二年级学生)之间的合作。这两个合作项目涉及的大多是英语学习者儿童。这些合作还展示了维果茨基通过社会互动促进认知发展的方法如何与他的学生鲁利亚评估个体心智/大脑神经心理过程的方法相结合。对于具有生物和文化多样性的学龄儿童,最有效的教学要考虑到个体和社会文化变量。