Berninger Virginia W, Abbott Robert D
University of Washington.
J Educ Psychol. 2010 Aug 1;102(3):635-651. doi: 10.1037/a0019319.
Age-normed tests of Listening Comprehension, Oral Expression, Reading Comprehension, and Written Expression were administered in grades 1 (n=128), 3, and 5 or 3 (n=113), 5, and 7. Confirmatory factor analyses compared one- and four- factor models at each grade level and supported a four- factor model of Language by Ear, Mouth, Eye, and Hand. Multiple regressions identified which of the three other language skills explained unique variance in each of the four language skill outcomes and provided additional evidence that language is not a single skill. Individuals' ipsative scores (amount that the standard score for age on each language measure deviated from individual's mean for all four measures) showed that 25% to 30% of individuals showed relative strengths or weaknesses (+ or - 1 SD) in specific language skills, but only 7% were stable across grades 3 and 5. Findings are discussed in reference to (a) theoretical implications for idea comprehension and expression via language by ear, mouth, eye, and hand, and (b) educational applications of observed developmental and individual differences for general, special, and gifted education.
在一年级(n = 128)、三年级和五年级,或三年级(n = 113)、五年级和七年级进行了听力理解、口语表达、阅读理解和书面表达的年龄常模测试。验证性因素分析在每个年级水平上比较了单因素模型和四因素模型,并支持了一个由耳朵、嘴巴、眼睛和手构成的语言四因素模型。多元回归确定了其他三种语言技能中的哪一种能够解释四种语言技能结果中每一种的独特方差,并提供了额外证据表明语言不是单一技能。个体的自身标准分数(每种语言测量的年龄标准分数与个体在所有四项测量中的平均分的偏差量)表明,25%至30%的个体在特定语言技能方面表现出相对优势或劣势(±1个标准差),但只有7%的个体在三年级和五年级保持稳定。研究结果将结合以下两点进行讨论:(a)通过耳朵、嘴巴、眼睛和手进行语言理解和表达的理论意义,以及(b)观察到的发展和个体差异在普通教育、特殊教育和天才教育中的教育应用。