Mertes P-M, Laxenaire M-C
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, hôpital Central, Nancy, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2004 Dec;23(12):1133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2004.10.013.
Hypersensitivity reactions IgE-mediated (anaphylaxis) or non-IgE-mediated (anaphylactoid) reactions occurring during anaesthesia remain a major cause of concern for anaesthesiologists, since these reactions remain usually unpredictable, may be potentially life-threatening even when appropriately treated. The authors report the results of the last 2-year survey (2001, 2002) of such reactions conducted in France by the GERAP (groupe d'etude des reactions anaphylactoides peranesthesiques), and compare these results with their previous published surveys.
Between January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2002, 712 patients who experienced immune-mediated (anaphylaxis) or non-immune-mediated (anaphylactoid) reactions were referred to one of the 40 allergo-anaesthesia centres members of the GERAP. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed on the basis of clinical history, tryptase measurements during the adverse reaction, and skin tests and/or specific IgE assay.
Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions were diagnosed in 491 cases (69%) and 221 cases (31%), respectively. The most common causes of anaphylaxis were neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) (n=271, 55%), latex (n=112, 22.3%), and antibiotics (n=74, 14.7%). Succinylcholine (n=102, 37.6%) and rocuronium (n=71, 26.2%) were the most frequently incriminated NMBAs. Cross-reactivity between NMBAs was observed in 63.4 % of cases of anaphylaxis to a NMBA. No difference was observed between anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions when the incidences of atopy, food, or drug intolerance were compared. However atopy, asthma and food allergy were significantly more frequent in case of latex allergy, when compared with NMBA allergy. Clinical manifestations were more severe in anaphylaxis. The positive predictive value of tryptase measurement for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis was 95.3%, the negative predictive value 49%. The diagnostic value of specific neuromuscular blocking agent IgE assays was confirmed.
Our results further corroborate the need for systematic screening in case of immediate hypersensitivity reaction during anaesthesia and for the constitution of allergo-anaesthesia centres to provide expert advice to anaesthesiologists and allergologists.
麻醉期间发生的超敏反应,即IgE介导的(过敏反应)或非IgE介导的(类过敏反应),仍然是麻醉医生主要关注的问题,因为这些反应通常难以预测,即使得到适当治疗也可能有潜在生命危险。作者报告了GERAP(围麻醉期类过敏反应研究小组)在法国进行的关于此类反应的最近两年(2001年、2002年)调查结果,并将这些结果与其之前发表的调查结果进行比较。
在2001年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间,712例发生免疫介导(过敏反应)或非免疫介导(类过敏反应)的患者被转至GERAP的40个过敏麻醉中心之一。过敏反应根据临床病史、不良反应期间的类胰蛋白酶测量以及皮肤试验和/或特异性IgE检测来诊断。
分别诊断出491例(69%)过敏反应和221例(31%)类过敏反应。过敏反应最常见的原因是神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)(n = 271,55%)、乳胶(n = 112,22.3%)和抗生素(n = 74,14.7%)。琥珀酰胆碱(n = 102,37.6%)和罗库溴铵(n = 71,26.2%)是最常涉及的NMBA。在对一种NMBA过敏反应的病例中,63.4%观察到NMBA之间的交叉反应。比较类过敏反应和过敏反应中特应性、食物或药物不耐受的发生率时,未观察到差异。然而,与NMBA过敏相比,乳胶过敏时特应性、哮喘和食物过敏明显更常见。过敏反应的临床表现更严重。类胰蛋白酶测量对过敏反应诊断的阳性预测值为95.3%,阴性预测值为49%。特异性神经肌肉阻滞剂IgE检测的诊断价值得到证实。
我们的结果进一步证实了在麻醉期间发生即刻超敏反应时进行系统筛查以及设立过敏麻醉中心以为麻醉医生和过敏科医生提供专家建议的必要性。