Särner B, Birkhed D, Huysmans M C D N J M, Ruben J L, Fidler V, Lingström P
Department of Cariology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Caries Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;39(1):52-9. doi: 10.1159/000081657.
The aim was to evaluate the effect of two toothpicks and two dental flosses on demineralized enamel and dentine and on plaque composition, using an in situ model with simulated approximal spaces within dentures. Fifteen subjects with full dentures were recruited and 14 completed the study. It consisted of two crossover periods, the first comparing a birch toothpick with AmF and a birch toothpick with NaF, and the second comparing a dental floss with AmF + NaF and a dental floss without F. Between these four periods, there was a control period without any approximal cleaning. In small, rectangular sample holders, one enamel and one dentine specimen were embedded, forming a triangular, approximal-like space. Two sample holders were mounted in the premolar-molar region of the upper or lower dentures. The subjects used the toothpicks or dental flosses 3 times/day for 4 weeks. The results showed that all toothpicks and dental flosses inhibited further demineralization compared to the control period (p < 0.001). The dental flosses were somewhat more effective in this respect than the toothpicks, especially in dentine. There were relatively small numerical differences between AmF and NaF toothpicks, but in favour of NaF regarding mineral gain (p < 0.05). The fluoridated floss gave somewhat less lesion depth in dentine than the non-fluoridated floss (p < 0.01). Toothpicks and flosses resulted in lower counts of microorganisms in plaque compared to the control period (p < 0.001); the AmF toothpick gave a more pronounced reduction than the NaF toothpick (p < 0.001).
本研究旨在使用带有模拟假牙邻面间隙的原位模型,评估两种牙签和两种牙线对脱矿釉质和牙本质以及菌斑成分的影响。招募了15名佩戴全口假牙的受试者,其中14名完成了研究。研究包括两个交叉期,第一个交叉期比较桦木牙签与含胺氟牙膏和桦木牙签与含氟化钠牙膏,第二个交叉期比较含胺氟 + 氟化钠牙线和不含氟牙线。在这四个阶段之间,有一个不进行任何邻面清洁的对照期。在小的矩形样本架中,嵌入一块釉质标本和一块牙本质标本,形成一个类似邻面的三角形间隙。两个样本架安装在上颌或下颌假牙的前磨牙 - 磨牙区域。受试者每天使用牙签或牙线3次,持续4周。结果表明,与对照期相比,所有牙签和牙线均抑制了进一步脱矿(p < 0.001)。在这方面,牙线比牙签更有效,尤其是在牙本质中。含胺氟牙膏的牙签和含氟化钠牙膏的牙签在数值上差异相对较小,但在矿物质增加方面,含氟化钠牙膏的牙签更具优势(p < 0.05)。含氟牙线在牙本质中产生的病变深度比不含氟牙线略浅(p < 0.01)。与对照期相比,牙签和牙线使菌斑中的微生物数量减少(p < 0.001);含胺氟牙膏的牙签比含氟化钠牙膏的牙签减少更为显著(p < 0.001)。