Figg William D, Franks Michael E, Venzon David, Duray Paul, Cox Michael C, Linehan W Marston, Van Bingham W, Eastham James A, Reed Eddie, Sartor Oliver
Molecular Pharmacology Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
World J Urol. 2004 Dec;22(6):425-30. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0443-7. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
Although multiple studies have addressed the prognostic importance of tumor differentiation in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, few data are available in patients with metastatic disease. We evaluated and compared survival data in two groups of men with Whitmore stage D2 metastatic prostate cancer initially treated with hormonal therapy. A series of 76 patients with D2 metastatic disease were evaluated and treated at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in conjunction with an additional cohort of 141 patients from the Louisiana State University School of Medicine (LSU). Pathological specimens were classified according to the Gleason score. Fifty-two (25%) of the combined NCI/LSU specimens had a Gleason score of 6 or less, 71 (34%) had a value of 7, and remaining 87 (41%) had scores between 8 and 10. The median PSA at the time of diagnosis for the NCI patients was 294.2 ng/ml. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time that a greater than 50% increase above nadir PSA was noted. In neither group was Gleason score correlated with overall survival. There was no association between the time to progression following hormone therapy and primary tumor Gleason score. The PSA concentration at the time of diagnosis was not correlated with the Gleason score for the NCI patients; however, there was an inverse correlation between pretreatment PSA level and time to progression following hormonal ablation. Gleason score does not appear to impact survival in metastatic prostate cancer. PSA as a marker of the biological behavior in metastatic disease may also be limited. These findings should be reevaluated in larger, better matched cohorts. Novel techniques such as serum proteomics, microarrays, and metastatic cell isolation methods may better predict outcome in advanced prostate cancer.
尽管多项研究探讨了临床局限性前列腺癌患者中肿瘤分化的预后重要性,但关于转移性疾病患者的数据却很少。我们评估并比较了两组最初接受激素治疗的惠特莫尔D2期转移性前列腺癌男性患者的生存数据。一组76例D2期转移性疾病患者在国立癌症研究所(NCI)接受评估和治疗,另外还有来自路易斯安那州立大学医学院(LSU)的141例患者组成的队列。病理标本根据 Gleason 评分进行分类。NCI/LSU联合标本中,52例(25%)的Gleason评分为6或更低,71例(34%)评分为7,其余87例(41%)评分在8至10之间。NCI患者诊断时的中位前列腺特异抗原(PSA)为294.2 ng/ml。治疗失败时间定义为PSA从最低点升高超过50%的时间。在两组中,Gleason评分均与总生存期无关。激素治疗后的进展时间与原发肿瘤的Gleason评分之间没有关联。NCI患者诊断时的PSA浓度与Gleason评分无关;然而,激素消融前的PSA水平与激素治疗后的进展时间呈负相关。Gleason评分似乎对转移性前列腺癌的生存没有影响。PSA作为转移性疾病生物学行为的标志物可能也有局限性。这些发现应在更大、匹配更好的队列中重新评估。血清蛋白质组学、微阵列和转移细胞分离方法等新技术可能能更好地预测晚期前列腺癌的预后。