Reichmann H, Boas J, Macmahon D, Myllyla V, Hakala A, Reinikainen K
Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty of the Technical University, Dresden, Germany.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Jan;111(1):21-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00363.x.
To compare the efficacy of levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) plus entacapone with levodopa/DDCI plus placebo on measures of parkinsonian disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IV study was performed in 270 PD patients randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or placebo with each dose of their current levodopa regimen. The primary variables were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II activities of daily living (ADL) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 summary index. UPDRS parts I, III-VI, Global Assessment of Change, PDQ-39 subscores, and the Short-Form (SF)-36 and the European Quality of Life five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were included as secondary variables.
There was a significant improvement in ADL scores with levodopa/DDCI/entacapone compared with levodopa/DDCI/placebo at 5 and 13 weeks (-2.3 vs -0.7, respectively; P = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments using the PDQ-39 summary index. UPDRS part III (motor) scores significantly decreased in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group compared with the levodopa/DDCI/placebo group (-5.0 vs -2.9, respectively; P = 0.03). Similarly, the change in the investigators Global Assessment was significantly greater (P = 0.004) in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group. There were no significant differences between treatments for any of the PDQ-39 subscores, the SF-36 variables or the EQ-5D utility score.
Levodopa combined with entacapone demonstrated good efficacy in terms of ADL, global function, motor performance and was well tolerated. However, this short-term study did not generate significant improvements in QoL.
比较左旋多巴/多巴脱羧酶抑制剂(DDCI)加恩他卡朋与左旋多巴/DDCI加安慰剂对出现运动波动的帕金森病(PD)患者帕金森病残疾程度及健康相关生活质量(QoL)指标的疗效。
对270例PD患者进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照的IV期研究,这些患者被随机分为接受恩他卡朋200mg或安慰剂,与他们当前的左旋多巴治疗方案的每一剂一起服用。主要变量为统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第二部分日常生活活动(ADL)以及帕金森病问卷(PDQ)-39总结指数。UPDRS第一、三至六部分、整体变化评估、PDQ-39子分数以及简短健康调查问卷(SF)-36和欧洲生活质量五维度问卷(EQ-5D)作为次要变量。
与左旋多巴/DDCI/安慰剂相比,左旋多巴/DDCI/恩他卡朋在第5周和第13周时ADL评分有显著改善(分别为-2.3和-0.7;P = 0.0001)。然而,使用PDQ-39总结指数时,各治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。与左旋多巴/DDCI/安慰剂组相比,左旋多巴/DDCI/恩他卡朋组的UPDRS第三部分(运动)评分显著降低(分别为-5.0和-2.9;P = 0.03)。同样,左旋多巴/DDCI/恩他卡朋组研究者整体评估的变化显著更大(P = 0.004)。各治疗组在任何PDQ-39子分数、SF-36变量或EQ-5D效用评分方面均无显著差异。
左旋多巴联合恩他卡朋在ADL、整体功能、运动表现方面显示出良好疗效,且耐受性良好。然而,这项短期研究未在生活质量方面产生显著改善。