Suppr超能文献

左旋多巴辅助药物治疗帕金森病症状波动的疗效和安全性比较——网状Meta分析

Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sako Wataru, Kogo Yuki, Koebis Michinori, Kita Yoshiaki, Yamakage Hajime, Ishida Takayuki, Hattori Nobutaka

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Medical Headquarters, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023 Oct 19;9(1):143. doi: 10.1038/s41531-023-00589-8.

Abstract

It remains unclear which adjunctive drug for Parkinson's disease (PD) in combination with levodopa is more effective, tolerable, and safe. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety among anti-PD drugs from several classes in patients with fluctuating PD who received levodopa through network meta-analysis (NMA). Twelve anti-PD drugs belonging to 4 different drug classes (dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) were selected. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo with anti-PD drug or among anti-PD drugs in patients with PD who experienced motor fluctuations or wearing-off and received levodopa. We included 54 RCTs in the analysis. The NMA was performed under a frequentist framework using a random-effects model. The efficacy outcome was change in daily off-time, and the tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to all causes. Safety outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs, dyskinesia, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) in the NMA, ropinirole transdermal patch (SUCRA, 0.861) ranked the highest in efficacy, followed by pramipexole (0.762), ropinirole extended release (ER) (0.750), and safinamide (0.691). In terms of tolerability, ropinirole (0.954) ranked the highest, followed by pramipexole (0.857), safinamide (0.717), and ropinirole ER (0.708). Each anti-PD drug had different SUCRA ranking profiles for the safety outcomes. These findings suggest that ropinirole, pramipexole, and safinamide are well-balanced anti-PD drugs that satisfy both efficacy and tolerability outcomes.

摘要

目前尚不清楚哪种用于帕金森病(PD)的辅助药物与左旋多巴联合使用时更有效、更耐受且更安全。我们旨在通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较几类抗PD药物在接受左旋多巴治疗的症状波动型PD患者中的疗效、耐受性和安全性。我们选择了属于4种不同药物类别的12种抗PD药物(多巴胺激动剂、单胺氧化酶B型抑制剂、儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶抑制剂和腺苷A2A受体拮抗剂)。我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以查找符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了安慰剂与抗PD药物,或在经历运动波动或疗效减退且接受左旋多巴治疗的PD患者中比较不同抗PD药物。我们纳入了54项RCT进行分析。NMA在频率论框架下使用随机效应模型进行。疗效结局为每日“关”期的变化,耐受性结局为因各种原因停药。安全性结局包括因不良事件(AE)停药、AE的发生率、异动症、幻觉和体位性低血压。根据NMA中的累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA),罗匹尼罗透皮贴剂(SUCRA,0.861)在疗效方面排名最高,其次是普拉克索(0.762)、罗匹尼罗缓释剂(ER)(0.750)和沙芬酰胺(0.691)。在耐受性方面,罗匹尼罗(0.954)排名最高,其次是普拉克索(0.857)、沙芬酰胺(0.717)和罗匹尼罗ER(0.708)。每种抗PD药物在安全性结局方面有不同的SUCRA排名情况。这些发现表明,罗匹尼罗、普拉克索和沙芬酰胺是在疗效和耐受性结局方面达到良好平衡的抗PD药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be33/10584871/655e13d73c74/41531_2023_589_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验