van Alphen S P J, Engelen G J J A, Kuin Y, Hoijtink H, Derksen J J L
Mondriaan Zorggroep, divisie Ouderen, Heerlen.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Oct;35(5):186-95.
Till now, no specific diagnostic instruments to detect personality disorders in the elderly are available. The aim of our study was to contribute to the construction of a reliable en valid instrument for the detection of personality disorders in older adults. Therefore, a draft version of the instrument was constructed both for the patient and the informant. Both the patient and the informant version of the instrument included 52 items with the same content. These items concerned Habitual behaviour (HAB), Biographical information (BIO) and Observation of actual behaviour (OBS). 159 clients of 60 years and older of a Dutch ambulatory mental health care organisation were assessed with the screening instrument. In 96 of the 159 outpatients one or more informants were included. The results indicate that the internal consistency of seven HAB items, nine BIO items and five OBS items was moderate to good with regard to both the patient and informant instrument. Test-retest reliability of the 21 items of the patient instrument was moderate with regard to HAB, excellent with regard to BIO and moderate with regard to OBS. Interrater reliability of OBS was also moderate. The criterion validity (criterion: DSM-IV TR Axis II classification) of HAB, BIO and OBS based on the 21 items of the patient instrument was fair and with regard to the same 21 items of the informant instrument insufficient. In conclusion, sixteen out of 52 potential items of the patient's draft version of the screening instrument can be used to detect a possible personality disorder. These sixteen items from the HAB and BIO scale are named the Gerontological Personality disorder Scale (GPS). Medical doctors, psychologists and nurses working in ambulatory mental health organisation can use the GPS as a resource during the diagnostic process. Whether the GPS can be used beyond mental health organisations, for example by general practitioners is a subject for future studies.
到目前为止,尚无用于检测老年人人格障碍的特定诊断工具。我们研究的目的是为构建一种可靠且有效的用于检测老年人人格障碍的工具做出贡献。因此,针对患者和信息提供者分别构建了该工具的草稿版本。该工具的患者版和信息提供者版均包含52个内容相同的项目。这些项目涉及习惯行为(HAB)、传记信息(BIO)和实际行为观察(OBS)。使用该筛查工具对荷兰一家门诊心理健康护理机构的159名60岁及以上的客户进行了评估。在159名门诊患者中,有96名纳入了一名或多名信息提供者。结果表明,就患者版和信息提供者版工具而言,7个HAB项目、9个BIO项目和5个OBS项目的内部一致性为中等至良好。患者版工具的21个项目的重测信度在HAB方面为中等,在BIO方面为优秀,在OBS方面为中等。OBS的评分者间信度也为中等。基于患者版工具的21个项目,HAB、BIO和OBS的效标效度(效标:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版轴II分类)为尚可,而就信息提供者版工具的相同21个项目而言则不足。总之,筛查工具患者版草稿中的52个潜在项目中有16个可用于检测可能的人格障碍。来自HAB和BIO量表的这16个项目被命名为老年人格障碍量表(GPS)。在门诊心理健康机构工作的医生、心理学家和护士在诊断过程中可将GPS作为一种参考工具。GPS是否可在心理健康机构之外使用,例如由全科医生使用,是未来研究的一个课题。