Suppr超能文献

评估预防性治疗对预防重症外科患者严重念珠菌病的效果。

Assessment of preemptive treatment to prevent severe candidiasis in critically ill surgical patients.

作者信息

Piarroux Renaud, Grenouillet Frédéric, Balvay Patrick, Tran Véronique, Blasco Gilles, Millon Laurence, Boillot Annie

机构信息

Department of Parasitology-Mycology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2443-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147726.62304.7f.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of a preemptive antifungal therapy in preventing proven candidiasis in critically ill surgical patients.

DESIGN

Before/after intervention study, with 2-yr prospective and 2-yr historical control cohorts.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in a university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Nine hundred and thirty-three patients, 478 in the prospective group and 455 in the control group, with SICU stay > or =5 days.

INTERVENTIONS

During the prospective period, systematic mycological screening was performed on all patients admitted to the SICU, immediately at admittance and then weekly until discharge. A corrected colonization index was used to assess intensity of Candida mucosal colonization. Patients with corrected colonization index > or =0.4 received early preemptive antifungal therapy (fluconazole intravenously: loading dose 800 mg, then 400 mg/day for 2 wks).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

End points of this study were the frequency of proven candidiasis, especially SICU-acquired candidiasis. During the retrospective period, 32 patients of 455 (7%) presented with proven candidiasis: 22 (4.8%) were imported and 10 (2.2%) were SICU-acquired cases. During the prospective period, 96 patients with corrected colonization index > or =0.4 of 478 received preemptive antifungal treatment and only 18 cases (3.8%) of proven candidiasis were diagnosed; all were imported infections. Candida infections occurred more frequently in the control cohort (7% vs. 3.8%; p = .03). Incidence of SICU-acquired proven candidiasis significantly decreased from 2.2% to 0% (p < .001, Fisher test). Incidence of proven imported candidiasis remained unchanged (4.8% vs. 3.8%; p = .42). No emergence of azole-resistant Candida species (especially Candida glabrata, Candida krusei) was noted during the prospective period.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted preemptive strategy may efficiently prevent acquisition of proven candidiasis in SICU patients. Further studies are being performed to assess cost-effectiveness of this strategy and its impact on selection of azole-resistant Candida strains on a long-term basis.

摘要

目的

评估抢先抗真菌治疗对预防重症外科患者确诊念珠菌病的疗效。

设计

干预前后研究,前瞻性队列和历史性对照队列各2年。

地点

大学附属医院的外科重症监护病房(SICU)。

患者

933例患者,前瞻性组478例,对照组455例,入住SICU≥5天。

干预措施

在前瞻性研究期间,对所有入住SICU的患者立即进行系统性真菌学筛查,入院时进行,之后每周进行一次直至出院。使用校正定植指数评估念珠菌黏膜定植强度。校正定植指数≥0.4的患者接受早期抢先抗真菌治疗(静脉注射氟康唑:负荷剂量800mg,然后400mg/天,共2周)。

测量指标及主要结果

本研究的终点是确诊念珠菌病的发生率,尤其是SICU获得性念珠菌病。回顾性研究期间,455例患者中有32例(7%)确诊为念珠菌病:22例(4.8%)为输入性病例,10例(2.2%)为SICU获得性病例。前瞻性研究期间,478例校正定植指数≥0.4的患者接受了抢先抗真菌治疗,仅18例(3.8%)确诊为念珠菌病;均为输入性感染。念珠菌感染在对照组中更常见(7%对3.8%;p = 0.03)。SICU获得性确诊念珠菌病的发生率从2.2%显著降至0%(p < 0.001,Fisher检验)。输入性确诊念珠菌病的发生率保持不变(4.8%对3.8%;p = 0.42)。前瞻性研究期间未发现唑类耐药念珠菌属(尤其是光滑念珠菌、克柔念珠菌)出现。

结论

针对性的抢先策略可有效预防SICU患者确诊念珠菌病的发生。正在进行进一步研究以评估该策略的成本效益及其对长期唑类耐药念珠菌菌株选择的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验