Xu Qiong, Fan Ming-wen, Fan Bing, Cheung Gary S P, Hu Han-lin
School of Stomatology, Wuhan University, China.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jan;99(1):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.006.
The purpose of this study was to introduce a new method for quantitative testing of endodontic leakage.
Eighty straight maxillary anterior teeth were divided randomly into 3 experimental groups of 20 samples each and 2 control groups. The experimental groups were prepared using the modified double-flared technique and obturated by lateral compaction of cold gutta-percha with Pulp Canal Sealer EWT, Sealapex, or AH Plus sealer. With the leakage test device, coronal 1 mol/L glucose solution was forced under a hydrostatic pressure of 1.5 kPa toward the apical part of the root. Leakage was measured by the concentration of leaked glucose in apical reservoir at 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 30 days with the enzymatic glucose oxidase method.
No significant difference of sealing ability was found among 3 test groups at 1, 2, 4, and 7 days. From the tenth day, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT showed the highest leakage, and the leakage was not significantly different between Sealapex and AH Plus.
The quantitative method is sensitive, nondestructive, and clinically relevant. Pulp Canal Sealer EWT showed more leakage than Sealapex and AH Plus in most observation time.
本研究旨在介绍一种根管微渗漏定量检测的新方法。
80颗上颌前牙被随机分为3个试验组,每组20个样本,另有2个对照组。试验组采用改良双喇叭口技术预备根管,并用冷牙胶侧方加压充填,分别使用牙髓根管封闭剂EWT、Sealapex或AH Plus封闭剂。使用渗漏测试装置,在1.5 kPa的静水压力下将冠方1 mol/L葡萄糖溶液压向根尖部。采用葡萄糖氧化酶酶法,在第1、2、4、7、10、15、20和30天通过检测根尖部储液器中渗漏葡萄糖的浓度来测量渗漏情况。
在第1、2、4和7天,3个试验组之间的封闭能力无显著差异。从第10天起,牙髓根管封闭剂EWT的渗漏率最高,Sealapex和AH Plus之间的渗漏率无显著差异。
该定量方法灵敏、无损且与临床相关。在大多数观察时间内,牙髓根管封闭剂EWT的渗漏比Sealapex和AH Plus更多。