De-Deus Gustavo, Coutinho-Filho Tauby, Reis Claudia, Murad Cristiana, Paciornik Sidnei
Department of Endodontics, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):998-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
The present study investigated the sealing ability of four root canal sealers at two different thicknesses. There were 82 maxillary incisors roots prepared with Gates Glidden drills up to size 6 and divided into four groups: Pulp Canal Sealer, EndoREZ, Sealapex, and AH Plus. Each group was divided in two subgroups and gutta-percha cylinders 1.5 or 1 mm wide were used, respectively. The roots were mounted in a bacterial leakage model and the system was checked daily during the following 12 wk. Data were analyzed by Log-Rank test and Student t-test. In the thin layer samples, the sealers demonstrated similar results while, in the thick layer samples, AH Plus revealed the best performance. Generally, greater sealer thickness influenced negatively the sealing ability of the root canal filling, except in AH Plus samples.
本研究调查了四种根管封闭剂在两种不同厚度下的封闭能力。用盖茨-格利登钻将82颗上颌切牙牙根预备至6号,分为四组:牙髓根管封闭剂、EndoREZ、Sealapex和AH Plus。每组再分为两个亚组,分别使用宽1.5或1mm的牙胶尖圆柱体。将牙根安装在细菌渗漏模型中,并在接下来的12周内每天检查该系统。数据采用对数秩检验和学生t检验进行分析。在薄层样本中,封闭剂表现出相似的结果,而在厚层样本中,AH Plus表现出最佳性能。一般来说,除了AH Plus样本外,更大的封闭剂厚度对根管充填的封闭能力有负面影响。