Den Boer J W, Yzerman E P F
Municipal Health Service Kennemerland, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Dec;23(12):871-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1248-8.
Since 1977, the diagnostic tools for Legionnaires' disease have been culture and serological investigation. Both methods require considerable time to produce results and have low to reasonable sensitivity. Since the introduction of urinary antigen tests in the mid 1990s, underdiagnosis has diminished and mortality has declined, thanks to early diagnosis. To obtain the most accurate diagnosis, culture, serological investigation, and urinary antigen testing should all be performed. In the last decade, much effort has been directed toward the development of assays detecting Legionella nucleic acid. Thus far, only widely varying results with small patient series have been reported. Furthermore, these assays are labour intensive and complicated. As a result, these assays are not yet suitable for the average medical microbiological laboratory.
自1977年以来,军团病的诊断工具一直是培养和血清学检测。这两种方法都需要相当长的时间才能得出结果,灵敏度也较低或一般。自20世纪90年代中期引入尿抗原检测以来,由于早期诊断,漏诊情况有所减少,死亡率也有所下降。为了获得最准确的诊断,应同时进行培养、血清学检测和尿抗原检测。在过去十年中,人们在开发检测军团菌核酸的检测方法方面投入了大量精力。到目前为止,仅有关于少量患者系列的差异很大的结果报道。此外,这些检测方法劳动强度大且复杂。因此,这些检测方法尚不适合普通医学微生物实验室。