Mariette Christophe, Finzi Laetitia, Piessen Guillaume, Van Seuningen Isabelle, Triboulet Jean Pierre
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Generale, Hopital Claude Huriez-CHRU, Place de Verdun, 59037 Lille Cedex, France.
World J Surg. 2005 Jan;29(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7542-x.
Whether squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus differ in their natural history and treatment outcome remains controversial. The aim of the study was to identify the similarities and differences between SCC and ADC in terms of their clinical and histologic presentations and the oncologic results. Curative esophagectomy was attempted in 742 consecutive patients between January 1982 and January 2002. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was proposed for patients with locally advanced tumors. Demographic parameters, histomorphologic tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, recurrence, and long-term prognosis were recorded retrospectively. The SCC and ADC groups were composed of 624 and 118 patients, respectively. ADC occurrence increased significantly during the study period. Compared to the SCC group, patients in the ADC group were significantly older and had a lower incidence of respiratory and otolaryngologic histories; they also had more advanced tumors and a higher percentage of invaded lymph nodes, shorter time until resumption of feeding, shorter hospital stay, a higher diffuse recurrence rate, and a lower incidence of tobacco-related second primary tumors. Five-year survival rates after R0 resection were 46% and 45% in the SCC and ADC groups, respectively (p = 0.804). There was a significant survival advantage for ADC patients with pT1, pN0, or stage I tumors (p < 0.050) and different independent prognostic factors than those with SCCs. In conclusion, the clinical, histologic, and oncologic differences between SCC and ADC justify a differentiated therapeutic concept for these two tumor entities and distinct consideration in clinical reports.
食管癌的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(ADC)在其自然病史和治疗结果方面是否存在差异仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定SCC和ADC在临床和组织学表现以及肿瘤学结果方面的异同。1982年1月至2002年1月期间,对742例连续患者尝试进行根治性食管切除术。对于局部晚期肿瘤患者,建议进行新辅助放化疗。回顾性记录人口统计学参数、组织形态学肿瘤特征、治疗策略、术后死亡率和发病率、复发情况以及长期预后。SCC组和ADC组分别由624例和118例患者组成。在研究期间,ADC的发生率显著增加。与SCC组相比,ADC组患者年龄明显更大,呼吸和耳鼻喉科病史的发生率更低;他们的肿瘤也更晚期,淋巴结侵犯百分比更高,恢复进食的时间更短,住院时间更短,弥漫性复发率更高,与烟草相关的第二原发肿瘤发生率更低。R0切除术后SCC组和ADC组的5年生存率分别为46%和45%(p = 0.804)。pT1、pN0或I期肿瘤的ADC患者具有显著的生存优势(p < 0.050),且与SCC患者存在不同的独立预后因素。总之,SCC和ADC在临床、组织学和肿瘤学方面的差异证明了针对这两种肿瘤实体采用不同治疗理念的合理性,以及在临床报告中应予以区别考虑。