• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A randomized clinical trial of ceftriaxone and amikacin versus piperacillin tazobactam and amikacin in febrile patients with hematological neoplasia and severe neutropenia.

作者信息

Rossini Fausto, Terruzzi Elisabetta, Verga Luisa, Larocca Alessandra, Marinoni Sara, Miccolis Isabella, Giltri Giuseppe, Isella Manuela, Parma Matteo, Pogliani Enrico M

机构信息

Hematology Unit, Hospital S. Gerardo, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2005 Jun;13(6):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0753-8. Epub 2004 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-004-0753-8
PMID:15599778
Abstract

GOAL OF WORK

We compared the efficacy of ceftriaxone (CA regimen) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PTA regimen) in association with amikacin in the treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic hematological patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 252 febrile episodes in 224 patients were randomized.

MAIN RESULTS

The CA regimen was effective in 62/122 evaluable episodes (50.8%), and the PTA regimen was effective in 64/121 (52.9%; P>0.2). Median time to failure was 4 and 5 days (P>0.1). Further infections developed in 21/122 episodes (17.2%) with the CA regimen and in 12/121 (9.9%) with the PTA regimen (P=0.06). The overall mortality at the end of the febrile episode was 11/243 (4.5%); seven deaths were considered to be related to infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin tended to become afebrile sooner and to suffer a lower rate of further infections, even though our data did not show any statistically significant differences between the two groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
A randomized clinical trial of ceftriaxone and amikacin versus piperacillin tazobactam and amikacin in febrile patients with hematological neoplasia and severe neutropenia.
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Jun;13(6):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0753-8. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
2
Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.头孢吡肟联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星用于血液科发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始抗生素治疗:一项开放、随机、多中心试验的结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Jul;50(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf087.
3
Meropenem plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin as empiric therapy for high-risk febrile neutropenia in children.美罗培南联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合奈替米星作为儿童高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性治疗
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Mar;21(2):115-23. doi: 10.1080/08880010490277321.
4
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热的经验性治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050184.
5
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中比头孢曲松加庆大霉素更有效:一项随机对照比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jun;11(6):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0463-7. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
6
Piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin as initial empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with acute leukemia.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星作为急性白血病患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症初始经验性治疗的比较
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 May;28(4):311-20. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2011.557144.
7
Imipenem/cilastatin versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients: results of the COSTINE study.亚胺培南/西司他丁与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦加阿米卡星用于发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗:COSTINE研究结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 May;21(5):645-55. doi: 10.1185/030079905X43631.
8
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin versus carbapenem monotherapy as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in childhood hematological malignancies.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星与碳青霉烯类单药治疗儿童血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性治疗比较
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008 Jun;25(4):291-9. doi: 10.1080/08880010802016847.
9
[Cefepime versus piperacillin/tazobactam with or without amikacin in the treatment of febrile hematological and oncological neutropenic patients in an internal medicine ward].[头孢吡肟与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联用或不联用阿米卡星治疗内科病房发热性血液学及肿瘤学中性粒细胞减少患者]
Harefuah. 2010 Dec;149(12):765-8, 813, 812.
10
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物联合或不联合阿米卡星作为癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性治疗:一项在大学医院进行的开放性随机试验结果。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between mortality and microbiological parameters in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤伴发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的死亡率与微生物学参数之间的关系。
Saudi Med J. 2018 Sep;39(9):878-885. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.9.22824.
2
Prevalence and risk factors of Gram-negative bacilli causing blood stream infection in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者革兰氏阴性杆菌血流感染的患病率及危险因素
Saudi Med J. 2016 Sep;37(9):979-84. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.9.14211.
3
Secondary Infections in Febrile Neutropenia in Hematological Malignancies: More Than Another Febrile Neutropenic Episode.

本文引用的文献

1
Ceftriaxone/Amikacin vs Ceftazidime/Amikacin as Empirical Therapy for Fever in Patients with Haematological Malignancy and Severe Granulocytopenia: Clinical and Economic Outcomes.头孢曲松/阿米卡星与头孢他啶/阿米卡星治疗血液恶性肿瘤伴严重粒细胞减少发热患者的经验性治疗:临床和经济结局。
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(5):425-33. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815050-00007.
2
2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer.2002年癌症中性粒细胞减少患者抗菌药物使用指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13.
3
A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing piperacillin-tazobactam with and without amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
血液系统恶性肿瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的继发感染:不止是又一次发热性中性粒细胞减少发作。
Turk J Haematol. 2015 Sep;32(3):243-50. doi: 10.4274/tjh.2013.0422.
4
Piperacillin-tazobactam in pediatric cancer patients younger than 25 months: a retrospective multicenter survey.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在25个月以下儿童癌症患者中的应用:一项回顾性多中心调查。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;26(11):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0382-5.
一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,比较哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合或不联合阿米卡星作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性治疗的效果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 15;33(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1086/322646. Epub 2001 Sep 14.
4
Incidence and outcome of pneumonia in patients with acute leukemia receiving first induction therapy with anthracycline-containing regimens.
Haematologica. 2000 Dec;85(12):1255-60.
5
Pseudomonas aeruginosa--still a frequent pathogen in patients with cancer: 11-year experience at a comprehensive cancer center.铜绿假单胞菌——仍是癌症患者中常见的病原体:一家综合癌症中心的11年经验
Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Aug;29(2):463-4. doi: 10.1086/520247.
6
Outcomes of bacteremia in patients with cancer and neutropenia: observations from two decades of epidemiological and clinical trials.癌症和中性粒细胞减少症患者菌血症的结局:二十年流行病学和临床试验观察结果
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Aug;25(2):247-59. doi: 10.1086/514550.
7
Efficacy and toxicity of single daily doses of amikacin and ceftriaxone versus multiple daily doses of amikacin and ceftazidime for infection in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.每日单次剂量的阿米卡星和头孢曲松与每日多次剂量的阿米卡星和头孢他啶治疗癌症和粒细胞减少症患者感染的疗效和毒性。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织国际抗菌治疗合作组
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 1;119(7 Pt 1):584-93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_Part_1-199310010-00006.
8
Monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: a randomized comparison of ceftazidime versus imipenem.癌症患者发热伴中性粒细胞减少的单药治疗:头孢他啶与亚胺培南的随机对照比较
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):165-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.165.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星作为癌症粒细胞缺乏患者发热的经验性治疗。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织国际抗菌治疗合作组
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):445-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.2.445.
10
Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia.针对长期发热且粒细胞减少的癌症患者的经验性抗生素和抗真菌治疗。
Am J Med. 1982 Jan;72(1):101-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90594-0.