Suppr超能文献

在有辅助和无辅助条件下,背景噪声中言语感知与背景噪声可接受度的比较。

Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.

作者信息

Nabelek Anna K, Tampas Joanna W, Burchfield Samuel B

机构信息

Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-0740, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):1001-11. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/074).

Abstract

Background noise is a significant factor influencing hearing-aid satisfaction and is a major reason for rejection of hearing aids. Attempts have been made by previous researchers to relate the use of hearing aids to speech perception in noise (SPIN), with an expectation of improved speech perception followed by an increased acceptance of hearing aids. Unfortunately, SPIN was not related to hearing-aid use or satisfaction. A new measure of listener reaction to background noise has been proposed. The acceptable noise level (ANL), expressed in decibels, is defined as a difference between the most comfortable listening level for speech and the highest background noise level that is acceptable when listening to and following a story. The ANL measure assumes that speech understanding in noise may not be as important as is the willingness to listen in the presence of noise. It has been established that people who accept background noise have smaller ANLs and tend to be "good" users of hearing aids. Conversely, people who cannot accept background noise have larger ANLs and may only use hearing aids occasionally or reject them altogether. Because this is a new measure, it was important to determine the reliability of the ANL over time with and without hearing aids, to determine the effect of acclimatization to hearing aids, and to compare the ANL to well-established measures such as speech perception scores collected with the SPIN test. Results from 50 listeners indicate that for both good and occasional hearing aid users, the ANL is comparable in reliability to the SPIN test and that both measures do not change with acclimatization. The ANLs and SPIN scores are unrelated. Although the SPIN scores improve with amplification, the ANLs are unaffected by amplification, suggesting that the ANL is inherent to an individual and can be established prior to hearing aid fitting as a possible predictor of hearing-aid use.

摘要

背景噪声是影响助听器满意度的一个重要因素,也是人们拒绝使用助听器的主要原因。以往的研究人员曾试图将助听器的使用与噪声中的言语感知(SPIN)联系起来,期望通过改善言语感知来提高对助听器的接受度。遗憾的是,SPIN与助听器的使用或满意度并无关联。一种针对听众对背景噪声反应的新测量方法已被提出。以分贝表示的可接受噪声水平(ANL),被定义为言语最舒适聆听水平与听故事并跟上故事情节时可接受的最高背景噪声水平之间的差值。ANL测量方法假定,噪声中的言语理解可能不如在有噪声情况下聆听的意愿那么重要。已经证实,能够接受背景噪声的人ANL较小,往往是助听器的“良好”使用者。相反,无法接受背景噪声的人ANL较大,可能只是偶尔使用助听器或完全拒绝使用。由于这是一种新的测量方法,确定佩戴和不佩戴助听器时ANL随时间变化的可靠性、确定适应助听器的效果以及将ANL与诸如通过SPIN测试收集的言语感知分数等成熟测量方法进行比较就显得很重要。50名听众的结果表明,对于助听器的良好使用者和偶尔使用者来说,ANL在可靠性方面与SPIN测试相当,并且这两种测量方法都不会因适应过程而改变。ANL和SPIN分数无关。尽管SPIN分数会随着放大而提高,但ANL不受放大的影响,这表明ANL是个体固有的,可以在助听器验配之前确定,作为助听器使用可能性的一个预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验