Pagnoux Christian, Guillevin Loïc
Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris V, Paris, France.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005 Jan;17(1):41-8. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000145518.91595.2f.
Peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement is of great diagnostic value in systemic vasculitides, because it occurs frequently and often early during the course of these diseases, despite the supposed blood-nerve barrier that should prevent or at least minimize PNS damage. However, it carries no poor prognostic value in vasculitides. Recent advances have been made in understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms of PNS involvement.
Vasculitic neuropathy may result from primary or secondary systemic vasculitides, or may be restricted to the PNS, in a form that is now also considered to be a systemic vasculitis. The blood-nerve barrier is not as efficient as the blood-brain barrier. Inflammatory cell infiltration into the vasa nervorum and epineurial arteries leads to ischemic axonal nerve injury and is facilitated by additional breaches in the blood-nerve barrier, induced by proinflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress-derived molecules, and matrix metalloproteinases. Although animal models of myeloperoxidase or, now, proteinase 3-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-inducing vasculitis have been developed, they do not support a role for antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in PNS involvement. Treatment should be chosen based on the other organ involvement and the patient's general condition. When PNS involvement is isolated, corticosteroids alone should be used as first-line treatment.
Apart from the so-called nonsystemic nerve vasculitis, PNS involvement is rarely the sole clinical sign of systemic necrotizing vasculitis, and its association with other typical manifestations is often suggestive of the diagnosis of vasculitis. Herein are summarized recent advances that have clarified but not yet fully elucidated the pathogenesis of peripheral neuropathy in systemic vasculitides, together with the latest clinical findings and therapeutic strategies.
周围神经系统(PNS)受累在系统性血管炎中具有重要的诊断价值,因为尽管存在假定的血-神经屏障可预防或至少减少PNS损伤,但PNS受累在这些疾病过程中经常且往往较早出现。然而,在血管炎中它不具有不良预后价值。在理解PNS受累的发病机制方面已取得了最新进展。
血管炎性神经病可能由原发性或继发性系统性血管炎引起,或者可能局限于PNS,其形式现在也被认为是一种系统性血管炎。血-神经屏障不如血-脑屏障有效。炎性细胞浸润到神经血管和神经外膜动脉会导致缺血性轴索性神经损伤,促炎细胞因子、氧化应激衍生分子和基质金属蛋白酶诱导的血-神经屏障的额外破坏会促进这种损伤。尽管已经建立了髓过氧化物酶或现在的蛋白酶3-抗中性粒细胞胞浆自身抗体诱导的血管炎动物模型,但它们不支持抗中性粒细胞胞浆自身抗体在PNS受累中的作用。应根据其他器官受累情况和患者的一般状况选择治疗方法。当孤立出现PNS受累时,应单独使用皮质类固醇作为一线治疗。
除了所谓的非系统性神经血管炎外,PNS受累很少是系统性坏死性血管炎的唯一临床体征,其与其他典型表现的关联往往提示血管炎诊断。本文总结了最近的进展,这些进展阐明了但尚未完全阐明系统性血管炎中周围神经病的发病机制,以及最新的临床发现和治疗策略。