Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson T F, Vallittu P K
Department of Conservative Dentistry, King's College, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00900.x.
To compare the penetration of two different bonding resins applied for different contact times, on glass reinforced-reinforced composite root canal posts showing an interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) or cross-linked polymer matrix. The research hypothesis was that the bonding resins were equally able to penetrate into the IPN post whereas less penetration was evident into the cross-linked post. In addition, the prolonged contact time of the bonding resin on the surface of post was assumed to increase the resin penetration.
A total of 36 posts, comprising 18 IPN posts (everStick Post) and 18 cross-linked posts (C Post Millennium) were divided into 12 groups of three posts. All posts had a diameter of 1.2 mm. Both bonding resins (Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus and Stick Resin) were labelled with Rhodamine B for determination of the resin penetration into the post. After contact times of 1, 30 and 300 s the bonding resins were light cured for 60 s. Penetration of bonding resins into three sections of each post was measured by confocal scanning light microscope. The influences of post and type of adhesive resin on resin diffusion into the polymer matrix of the post were assessed by nonparametric methods.
For C Post Millennium and for 1 s contact time, no penetration of bonding resins into the polymer matrix of posts occurred in any section of any post. For the everStick Post, penetration was always noted after 300 s contact (mean 22.8 microm) and nearly always after 30 s contact (mean 3.5 microm), with very little difference between the two adhesives. The degree of penetration into everStick Posts was invariably greater after 300 s contact than after 30 s (P < 0.001). Both sets of results were highly significantly greater than the zero penetration recorded using C Post Millennium or 1 s contact time (P < 0.001).
The ability of bonding resins to penetrate into everStick Post with IPN polymer matrix may give the opportunity to establish a good link between fibre-reinforced composite posts, luting cements and composite cores.
比较两种不同粘结树脂在不同接触时间下,对呈现互穿聚合物网络(IPN)或交联聚合物基质的玻璃增强复合根管桩的渗透情况。研究假设是,粘结树脂同样能够渗透到IPN桩中,而在交联桩中的渗透则不明显。此外,假定粘结树脂在桩表面的延长接触时间会增加树脂的渗透。
总共36根桩,包括18根IPN桩(everStick桩)和18根交联桩(C Post Millennium桩),被分成12组,每组三根桩。所有桩的直径均为1.2毫米。两种粘结树脂(Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus和Stick Resin)均用罗丹明B标记,以测定树脂在桩中的渗透情况。在接触1、30和300秒后,粘结树脂进行60秒的光固化。通过共聚焦扫描光学显微镜测量粘结树脂在每根桩的三个部分中的渗透情况。采用非参数方法评估桩和粘结树脂类型对树脂扩散到桩的聚合物基质中的影响。
对于C Post Millennium桩和1秒的接触时间,在任何一根桩的任何部分,粘结树脂均未渗透到桩的聚合物基质中。对于everStick桩,在接触300秒后总是能观察到渗透(平均22.8微米),在接触30秒后几乎总是能观察到渗透(平均3.5微米),两种粘结剂之间差异很小。在接触300秒后,everStick桩的渗透程度始终大于接触30秒后的渗透程度(P < 0.001)。两组结果均显著高于使用C Post Millennium桩或1秒接触时间记录的零渗透情况(P < 0.001)。
粘结树脂渗透到具有IPN聚合物基质的everStick桩中的能力,可能为在纤维增强复合桩、粘结水门汀和复合核之间建立良好连接提供机会。