Suppr超能文献

两种不同牙根水平下,用两种黏固剂黏结的两种类型牙桩的推出粘结强度。

Push-out Bond Strength of Two Types of Dental Post Luted with Two Types of Cement at Two Different Root Levels.

作者信息

Alhajj Mohammed Nasser, Salim Nurul Shafiqah, Johari Yanti, Syahrizal Mohamad, Abdul-Muttlib Nor Aidaniza, Ariffin Zaihan

机构信息

Prosthodontics Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Sep;54(3):263-272. doi: 10.15644/asc54/3/4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endodontically treated teeth may require posts for retaining the core and replacing the coronal structures that have been lost. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength between different types of post cemented with different types of luting cement at different types of root level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, a total of 48 single-rooted permanent human teeth were decoronated, and the roots were treated endodontically. Following post space preparation, the sample was divided into four groups (n= 12 each) based on the types of post and cement. Two different types of post [GC everStickPOST (ES) and Parapost Fiber Lux (PF)], and two different types of cement [G-CEM (G), and RelyX Unicem (R)] were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. All roots were sectioned at the coronal and middle thirds with a thickness of 3±0.1mm. The Push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/ min. The bond strength values were recorded, and the data were analyzed using the SPSS program. Apart from descriptive statistics, three-way ANOVA was used for the interaction of the independent variables (post, cement, and root level). For differences between the groups, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.

RESULTS

Push-out bond strength of samples at the middle level (11.38±10.31 MPa), with PF posts (11.18±9.98 MPa), and of those luted with RelyX Unicem cement (13.26±8.73 MPa) was higher than that of their counterparts. The PBS means of RelyX Unicem cement at both root levels were much higher than PBS means of G-CEM cement. Three-way ANOVA test revealed a significant effect for each variable with a higher effect of cement (Sum of Squares= 1310.690; P< 0.001). No significant difference (P= 0.153) was found between the coronal and middle parts and between ES and PF posts (P= 0.058). However, a highly significant difference (P< 0.001) was found between RelyX Unicem and G-CEM cements.

CONCLUSION

The type of cement had a significant effect on push-out bond strength with RelyX Unicem which had higher values than G-CEM. However, the type of post and root level had no significant effect on PBS, although Parapost® Fiber Lux and middle root level had higher values than their counterparts.

摘要

目的

经牙髓治疗的牙齿可能需要桩来保留核并替代已丧失的冠部结构。本研究的目的是评估和比较不同类型的桩与不同类型的粘结水门汀在不同牙根水平粘结时的推出粘结强度。

材料与方法

在本研究中,共选取48颗单根恒牙,去除冠部,对牙根进行牙髓治疗。在制备桩道后,根据桩和水门汀的类型将样本分为四组(每组n = 12)。按照制造商的说明,使用两种不同类型的桩[GC everStickPOST(ES)和Parapost Fiber Lux(PF)]以及两种不同类型的水门汀[G-CEM(G)和RelyX Unicem(R)]。所有牙根在冠部和中部三分之一处进行切片,厚度为3±0.1mm。使用万能试验机以0.5mm/分钟的十字头速度进行推出粘结强度(PBS)测试。记录粘结强度值,并使用SPSS程序对数据进行分析。除描述性统计外,采用三因素方差分析来分析自变量(桩、水门汀和牙根水平)之间的相互作用。对于组间差异,使用曼-惠特尼U检验。所有分析中,P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

中部水平样本(11.38±10.31MPa)、使用PF桩的样本(11.18±9.98MPa)以及使用RelyX Unicem水门汀粘结的样本(13.26±8.73MPa)的推出粘结强度高于其对应样本。在两个牙根水平,RelyX Unicem水门汀的PBS均值均远高于G-CEM水门汀的PBS均值。三因素方差分析显示每个变量都有显著影响,其中水门汀的影响更大(平方和 = 1310.690;P < 0.001)。在冠部和中部之间以及ES桩和PF桩之间未发现显著差异(P = 0.153)(P = 0.058)。然而,RelyX Unicem水门汀和G-CEM水门汀之间存在高度显著差异(P < 0.001)。

结论

水门汀类型对推出粘结强度有显著影响,RelyX Unicem水门汀的值高于G-CEM水门汀。然而,桩的类型和牙根水平对PBS没有显著影响,尽管Parapost® Fiber Lux桩和牙根中部水平的值高于其对应样本。

相似文献

2
Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):957-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
4
Bond Strength of Individually Formed and Prefabricated Fiber-reinforced Composite Posts.
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(6):557-565. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43649.
6
Influence of root dentin treatment on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.
Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):170-177. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0252-7. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60353-4.
10
Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):390-6. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130466. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Aging Effect on Push-Out Bond Strength of Six Resin Cements: An In Vitro Study.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;18(6):1371. doi: 10.3390/ma18061371.

本文引用的文献

2
Effect of Fiber Post-Resin Matrix Composition on Bond Strength of Post-Cement Interface.
Int J Dent. 2018 Dec 2;2018:4751627. doi: 10.1155/2018/4751627. eCollection 2018.
3
Intracanal Adaptation of a Fiber Reinforced Post System as Compared to a Cast Post-and-Core.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Dec;50(4):329-336. doi: 10.15644/asc50/4/6.
5
Morphology and age-related changes in calcospherites of human teeth: an ultrastructural study.
Ann Hum Biol. 2017 Jun;44(4):349-356. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2016.1270353. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
6
8
Push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement used as endodontic sealer.
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Nov;39(4):282-7. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.282. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;6(1):60-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.60. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
10
Push-out bond strength of a fiber post system with two resin cements.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Dec;8(Suppl 1):S88-93.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验