Alhajj Mohammed Nasser, Salim Nurul Shafiqah, Johari Yanti, Syahrizal Mohamad, Abdul-Muttlib Nor Aidaniza, Ariffin Zaihan
Prosthodontics Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Sep;54(3):263-272. doi: 10.15644/asc54/3/4.
Endodontically treated teeth may require posts for retaining the core and replacing the coronal structures that have been lost. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength between different types of post cemented with different types of luting cement at different types of root level.
In this study, a total of 48 single-rooted permanent human teeth were decoronated, and the roots were treated endodontically. Following post space preparation, the sample was divided into four groups (n= 12 each) based on the types of post and cement. Two different types of post [GC everStickPOST (ES) and Parapost Fiber Lux (PF)], and two different types of cement [G-CEM (G), and RelyX Unicem (R)] were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. All roots were sectioned at the coronal and middle thirds with a thickness of 3±0.1mm. The Push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/ min. The bond strength values were recorded, and the data were analyzed using the SPSS program. Apart from descriptive statistics, three-way ANOVA was used for the interaction of the independent variables (post, cement, and root level). For differences between the groups, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.
Push-out bond strength of samples at the middle level (11.38±10.31 MPa), with PF posts (11.18±9.98 MPa), and of those luted with RelyX Unicem cement (13.26±8.73 MPa) was higher than that of their counterparts. The PBS means of RelyX Unicem cement at both root levels were much higher than PBS means of G-CEM cement. Three-way ANOVA test revealed a significant effect for each variable with a higher effect of cement (Sum of Squares= 1310.690; P< 0.001). No significant difference (P= 0.153) was found between the coronal and middle parts and between ES and PF posts (P= 0.058). However, a highly significant difference (P< 0.001) was found between RelyX Unicem and G-CEM cements.
The type of cement had a significant effect on push-out bond strength with RelyX Unicem which had higher values than G-CEM. However, the type of post and root level had no significant effect on PBS, although Parapost® Fiber Lux and middle root level had higher values than their counterparts.
经牙髓治疗的牙齿可能需要桩来保留核并替代已丧失的冠部结构。本研究的目的是评估和比较不同类型的桩与不同类型的粘结水门汀在不同牙根水平粘结时的推出粘结强度。
在本研究中,共选取48颗单根恒牙,去除冠部,对牙根进行牙髓治疗。在制备桩道后,根据桩和水门汀的类型将样本分为四组(每组n = 12)。按照制造商的说明,使用两种不同类型的桩[GC everStickPOST(ES)和Parapost Fiber Lux(PF)]以及两种不同类型的水门汀[G-CEM(G)和RelyX Unicem(R)]。所有牙根在冠部和中部三分之一处进行切片,厚度为3±0.1mm。使用万能试验机以0.5mm/分钟的十字头速度进行推出粘结强度(PBS)测试。记录粘结强度值,并使用SPSS程序对数据进行分析。除描述性统计外,采用三因素方差分析来分析自变量(桩、水门汀和牙根水平)之间的相互作用。对于组间差异,使用曼-惠特尼U检验。所有分析中,P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
中部水平样本(11.38±10.31MPa)、使用PF桩的样本(11.18±9.98MPa)以及使用RelyX Unicem水门汀粘结的样本(13.26±8.73MPa)的推出粘结强度高于其对应样本。在两个牙根水平,RelyX Unicem水门汀的PBS均值均远高于G-CEM水门汀的PBS均值。三因素方差分析显示每个变量都有显著影响,其中水门汀的影响更大(平方和 = 1310.690;P < 0.001)。在冠部和中部之间以及ES桩和PF桩之间未发现显著差异(P = 0.153)(P = 0.058)。然而,RelyX Unicem水门汀和G-CEM水门汀之间存在高度显著差异(P < 0.001)。
水门汀类型对推出粘结强度有显著影响,RelyX Unicem水门汀的值高于G-CEM水门汀。然而,桩的类型和牙根水平对PBS没有显著影响,尽管Parapost® Fiber Lux桩和牙根中部水平的值高于其对应样本。