Iucif Nelson, Rocha Juan S Yazlle
Departamento de Medicina Social, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Dec;38(6):780-6. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000600005. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
The evaluation of quality and equity in healthcare attendance requires adequate study methods and information systems. Thus, this study was performed with the objective of comparing mortality among elderly patients attended within the private network and within the Brazilian national health system (SUS).
An information system that recorded causes of hospitalization and associated diseases (comorbidity) in relation to public and private hospital admissions was utilized. The hospitalization of 21,695 patients in Ribeirão Preto, State of Sao Paulo, in 1998 and 1999 was studied. These patients had diseases of the circulatory and respiratory systems. Analysis was done via the methodology put forward by Charlson, in which comorbidities are scored to give the Charlson comorbidity index and age over 50 years (per decade) is scored to give the Charlson comorbidity-age index. The patients were stratified according to comorbidity and decade of age over 50 years, with separation of hospitalizations via SUS from those via the private network (non-SUS). The coefficient of hospital mortality was calculated for each stratum.
It was observed that the risk of death increased almost sixfold when the number of associated diseases increased. The risk of death for SUS patients was more than twice the risk for non-SUS patients (relative risk: 2.12). Significant differences between SUS and non-SUS patients were found by associating the patient's comorbidity with decade of age. When the risk of death was very low or very high, there were no statistical differences between SUS and non-SUS patients. In other, intermediate situations, precisely where the attendance might make a difference, the mortality among SUS patients was more than twice as great (relative risk: 2.14).
The difference in mortality between SUS and non-SUS patients, according to Charlson's criteria, is significant among patients of intermediate risk, for whom the care is most important. The Charlson comorbidity index correlates with hospital mortality.
评估医疗服务的质量和公平性需要适当的研究方法和信息系统。因此,本研究旨在比较在私立医疗网络和巴西国家卫生系统(SUS)接受治疗的老年患者的死亡率。
使用一个信息系统,该系统记录了与公立和私立医院入院相关的住院原因和相关疾病(合并症)。研究了1998年和1999年在圣保罗州里贝朗普雷图的21695名患者的住院情况。这些患者患有循环系统和呼吸系统疾病。分析采用Charlson提出的方法进行,其中对合并症进行评分以得出Charlson合并症指数,对50岁以上(每十年)的年龄进行评分以得出Charlson合并症-年龄指数。患者根据合并症和50岁以上的年龄十年进行分层,将通过SUS的住院治疗与通过私立网络(非SUS)的住院治疗分开。计算每个阶层的医院死亡率系数。
观察到,随着相关疾病数量的增加,死亡风险几乎增加了六倍。SUS患者的死亡风险是非SUS患者的两倍多(相对风险:2.12)。通过将患者的合并症与年龄十年相关联,发现SUS患者和非SUS患者之间存在显著差异。当死亡风险非常低或非常高时,SUS患者和非SUS患者之间没有统计学差异。在其他中间情况下,恰恰是在医疗服务可能产生差异的地方,SUS患者的死亡率是两倍多(相对风险:2.14)。
根据Charlson标准,SUS患者和非SUS患者之间的死亡率差异在中度风险患者中显著,而对这些患者的护理最为重要。Charlson合并症指数与医院死亡率相关。