Martins Mônica, Blais Régis
Departamento de Administração e Planejamento em Saúde, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca, Rio de Janeiro/RJ 21042-210, Brazil.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;59(7):665-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
The objectives of the current study were: to compare the predictive capacity of the original Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the CCI with new assigned diagnostic codes and estimated weights, and a new developed comorbidity index in a Brazilian population; and to study the effect of the number of comorbidity diseases recorded on the predictive capacity of the comorbidity indices.
The study was limited to the Ribeirão Preto region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, from January 1996 to December 1998. We included only admissions in which the principal diagnoses were respiratory and circulatory diseases.
Evaluation of the CCI indicates that revision of the clinical conditions studied by Charlson, as well as their weights, increased mortality model predictive capacity. The C statistic was 0.72 for the original CCI, and increased to 0.74 for the CCI with new weights and 0.76 for the new index. The C statistic increases in all the comorbidity indices with the utilization of more diagnostic information. This impact is greater when a second secondary diagnosis is added.
The results of the validity analysis for comorbidity indices favor the utilization of empirically developed indices. However, the increase in predictive capacity was weak. In addition, age and principal diagnosis are the most important predictors of inpatient mortality.
本研究的目的是:比较原始查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、采用新指定诊断编码和估计权重的CCI以及新开发的合并症指数在巴西人群中的预测能力;并研究记录的合并症疾病数量对合并症指数预测能力的影响。
该研究限于1996年1月至1998年12月巴西圣保罗州的里贝朗普雷图地区。我们仅纳入主要诊断为呼吸系统和循环系统疾病的住院病例。
对CCI的评估表明,对查尔森所研究的临床状况及其权重进行修订可提高死亡率模型的预测能力。原始CCI的C统计量为0.72,采用新权重的CCI的C统计量增至0.74,新指数的C统计量为0.76。随着更多诊断信息的使用,所有合并症指数的C统计量均增加。当添加第二个次要诊断时,这种影响更大。
合并症指数有效性分析的结果支持使用经验性开发的指数。然而,预测能力的提高很微弱。此外,年龄和主要诊断是住院患者死亡率最重要的预测因素。