Jaïs P, Hocini M, Sacher F, Clémenty J, Haïssaguerre M
Service de rythmologie, hôpital cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Pessac.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004 Nov;97(11):1071-7.
Atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia, is frequently disabling and drug resistant and is associated with significant complications, especially thromboembolic events. Non-pharmacological approaches including surgery and catheter-based ablation have been developed for the most symptomatic patients. These new treatment strategies have dramatically increased our knowledge of the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia but most importantly have demonstrated that atrial fibrillation is curable. Since 1994, 2 different concepts have been used, aiming to modify the substrate responsible for AF maintenance using linear lesions, or to ablate the triggers located from within the pulmonary veins (PV) in about 90% of cases. The vast majority of the laboratories in the world are now using approaches centred on isolation of the PV. These approaches are far from being perfect but good enough to be offered in routine practice to selected patients in experienced centres. The importance of PVs in the initiation of AF has been clearly demonstrated and they also have a possible role in the maintenance of AF. However, the existence of non venous foci or a prominent substrate for AF maintenance limits the success rate to about 70%. As a consequence, a combination of PV isolation and linear lesions is commonly used. This more complex procedure carries a significantly higher success rate however with an increased risk of tamponade. As a consequence, we need to identify which patients will require linear lesions in addition to PV isolation. At the present time, AF ablation is restricted to symptomatic patients who have failed at least 1-2 antiarrhythmic drugs but future technical improvements based on presently applied concepts are likely to widen the indications for ablation therapy of AF.
心房颤动是最常见的心律失常,常常导致功能障碍且具有耐药性,并伴有严重并发症,尤其是血栓栓塞事件。对于症状最为严重的患者,已开发出包括手术和导管消融在内的非药物治疗方法。这些新的治疗策略极大地增进了我们对这种心律失常病理生理学的认识,但最重要的是证明了心房颤动是可治愈的。自1994年以来,人们采用了两种不同的理念,一种旨在通过线性损伤来改变维持房颤的基质,另一种则是在约90%的病例中消融肺静脉内的触发灶。目前世界上绝大多数实验室都在采用以隔离肺静脉为中心的方法。这些方法远非完美,但在经验丰富的中心,对于选定的患者来说,已足以在常规实践中应用。肺静脉在房颤起始中的重要性已得到明确证实,它们在房颤维持中也可能发挥作用。然而,非静脉起源灶的存在或维持房颤的显著基质限制了成功率,约为70%。因此,通常会联合使用肺静脉隔离和线性损伤。这种更为复杂的手术成功率显著更高,但心包填塞的风险也增加了。因此,我们需要确定哪些患者除了肺静脉隔离外还需要进行线性损伤。目前,房颤消融仅限于至少对1 - 2种抗心律失常药物治疗无效的有症状患者,但基于当前应用理念的未来技术改进可能会扩大房颤消融治疗的适应症。