• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估人工搬运风险控制方面的投资:一种用于观察性研究的评分系统。

Assessing investment in manual handling risk controls: a scoring system for use in observational studies.

作者信息

Smedley J, Poole J, Waclawski E, Stevens A, Harrison J, Buckle P, Coggon D

机构信息

MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;62(1):63-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.012237.

DOI:10.1136/oem.2003.012237
PMID:15613612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1740859/
Abstract

Most UK hospitals now have manual handling policies, but few studies have assessed their impact. To facilitate such research, a system for ranking the investment in manual handling risk controls was devised and applied to 109 acute hospitals in the UK. High scoring hospitals performed well on all aspects of manual handling risk management. Low scoring hospitals had a manual handling policy and recorded accidents and sickness absence, but had limited resource for expert manpower and equipment.

摘要

英国大多数医院现在都有手动搬运政策,但很少有研究评估其影响。为便于开展此类研究,设计了一种手动搬运风险控制投资排名系统,并应用于英国109家急症医院。得分高的医院在手动搬运风险管理的各个方面表现良好。得分低的医院有手动搬运政策,并记录了事故和病假情况,但专家人力和设备资源有限。

相似文献

1
Assessing investment in manual handling risk controls: a scoring system for use in observational studies.评估人工搬运风险控制方面的投资:一种用于观察性研究的评分系统。
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;62(1):63-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.012237.
2
Devastating injuries in healthcare workers: description of the crisis and legislative solution to the epidemic of back injury from patient lifting.医护人员的严重伤害:危机描述及针对因搬运患者导致背部受伤这一流行病的立法解决方案。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(2):225-41. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i2.90.
3
Manual handling risk controls in hospitals (MARCH): a cross-sectional survey of UK hospitals.医院手动操作风险控制(MARCH):英国医院的横断面调查
Health Serv Manage Res. 2004 May;17(2):121-31. doi: 10.1258/095148404323043145.
4
Manual handling at work.工作中的人工搬运
Commun Dis Public Health. 2000 Sep;3(3):227-8.
5
Creating a culture of change through implementation of a safe patient handling program.通过实施安全患者搬运计划营造变革文化。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2007 Jun;19(2):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2007.02.007.
6
Musculoskeletal injuries among hospital patient care staff before and after implementation of patient lift and transfer equipment.医疗机构中患者护理人员在使用患者升降和转移设备前后的肌肉骨骼损伤情况。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Jan;39(1):27-36. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3288. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
7
A 'win-win' for manual material handling.手动物料搬运的“双赢”局面。
Occup Health Saf. 2004 Sep;73(9):168-72.
8
American Nurses Association position statement on elimination of manual patient handling to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders.美国护士协会关于消除人工搬运患者以预防与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的立场声明。
Prairie Rose. 2004;73(4):18-9.
9
Effects of a multifaceted minimal-lift environment for nursing staff: pilot results.多方面最小提升环境对护理人员的影响:初步结果
West J Nurs Res. 2010 Feb;32(1):47-63. doi: 10.1177/0193945909342878. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
10
Update on evidence-based practices for safe patient handling and movement.安全患者搬运与移动的循证实践最新进展。
Orthop Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):367-8.