Sjöström M, Lundgren S, Nilson H, Sennerby L
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Umeå University, SE 901 78 Umeå, Sweden.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jan;34(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.03.007.
The aim of this prospective study was to compare implants placed in grafted and normal non-grafted maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), clinical stability and implant failure. Twenty-nine patients with severe atrophy of the edentulous maxilla were treated with autogenous bone grafts as onlay (24 patients) or as interpositional grafts in conjunction with a Le Fort I osteotomy (five patients) 6 months prior to placement of 222 implants. Ten non-grafted patients treated with 75 Brånemark implants in the edentulous maxillae served as a control group. RFA was performed at implant placement, abutment connection and after 6 months of bridge loading. Seventeen (8%) implants were lost in the grafted bone and one (1%) in normal bone. RFA revealed a similar pattern in both grafted and normal maxillae, i.e. increasing resonance frequency (RF) with time (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for paired data). Twenty implants that were rotation mobile (low primary stability) at the time of insertion showed a significantly lower value at implant placement according to RFA (Mann-Whitney U-test, P = 0.020). The RF for the failed implants revealed a tendency towards lower values (Mann-Whitney U-test, P = 0.072), compared to the successful implants. It is concluded that implants placed in grafted bone when using a two-stage technique achieve a stability similar to that of implants placed in normal non-grafted bone.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是通过共振频率分析(RFA)、临床稳定性和种植体失败情况,比较植入移植骨和正常未移植上颌骨的种植体。29例无牙上颌严重萎缩患者在植入222颗种植体前6个月接受了自体骨移植,其中24例采用覆盖式移植,5例采用联合Le Fort I截骨术的嵌入性移植。10例在无牙上颌植入75颗Brånemark种植体的未移植患者作为对照组。在种植体植入、基台连接时以及桥体加载6个月后进行RFA。移植骨中有17颗(8%)种植体丢失,正常骨中有1颗(1%)种植体丢失。RFA显示移植骨和正常上颌骨的模式相似,即共振频率(RF)随时间增加(配对数据的Wilcoxon符号秩检验)。根据RFA,20颗在植入时可旋转移动(初始稳定性低)的种植体在植入时显示出显著较低的值(Mann-Whitney U检验,P = 0.020)。与成功植入的种植体相比,失败种植体的RF有降低的趋势(Mann-Whitney U检验,P = 0.072)。结论是,采用两阶段技术时,植入移植骨的种植体获得的稳定性与植入正常未移植骨的种植体相似。