Al-Qattan M M
Division of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):90-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.08.005.
This randomized prospective clinical study compared the use of two absorbable sutures, Vicryl Rapide versus Vicryl, in elective paediatric hand surgery. Sixty children were randomly allocated into two groups (30 in each group) and all were seen and assessed at 3 and 6 weeks for wound complications and suture reactions. Five problems occurred in the Vicryl treatment group and none in the Vicryl Rapide group (P=0.03). All the problems were related to the delayed absorption of the Vicryl suture material and hence the prolonged presence of the suture in the hands of these children. It is concluded that Vicryl Rapide sutures are more suitable than Vicryl ones in paediatric hand surgery.
这项随机前瞻性临床研究比较了两种可吸收缝线（快薇乔与薇乔）在小儿择期手部手术中的应用。60名儿童被随机分为两组（每组30名），并在3周和6周时对所有儿童进行伤口并发症和缝线反应的观察与评估。薇乔治疗组出现了5例问题，而快薇乔组未出现任何问题（P=0.03）。所有问题均与薇乔缝线材料吸收延迟有关，因此缝线在这些儿童手中留存时间延长。得出的结论是，在小儿手部手术中，快薇乔缝线比薇乔缝线更合适。
