Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术期间,斑块血管成形术与一期缝合及不同类型补片材料的随机对照试验的系统评价。

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Bond R, Rerkasem K, Naylor A R, Aburahma A F, Rothwell P M

机构信息

Stroke Prevention Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.048.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may reduce the risk for perioperative or late carotid artery recurrent stenosis and subsequent ischemic stroke. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared with CEA with primary closure, and the effect of different materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

METHODS

Randomized trials were included if they compared carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in any patients undergoing CEA or use of one type of carotid patch with another.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible randomized trials were identified. Seven trials involving 1281 operations compared primary closure with routine patch closure, and 8 trials with 1480 operations compared different patch materials (2 studies compared both). Patch angioplasty was associated with a reduction in risk for stroke of any type (P = .004), ipsilateral stroke (P = .001), and stroke or death during both the perioperative period (P = .007) and long-term follow-up (P = .004). Patching was also associated with reduced risk for perioperative arterial occlusion (P = .0001) and decreased recurrent stenosis during long-term follow-up (P < .0001). Seven trials that compared different patch types showed no difference in the risk for stroke, death, or arterial recurrent stenosis either perioperatively or at 1-year follow-up. One study of 180 patients (200 arteries) compared collagen-impregnated Dacron (Hemashield) patches with polytetrafluoroethylene patches. There was a significant increase in risk for stroke (P = .02), combined stroke and transient ischemic attack (P = .03), and recurrent stenosis (P = .01) at 30 days, and an increased risk for late recurrent stenosis greater than 50% (P < .001) associated with Dacron compared with polytetrafluoroethylene.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid patch angioplasty decreases the risk for perioperative death or stroke, and long-term risk for ipsilateral ischemic stroke. More data are required to establish differences between various patch materials.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)期间进行补片血管成形术可能会降低围手术期或晚期颈动脉再狭窄及随后缺血性卒中的风险。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,以评估常规或选择性颈动脉补片血管成形术与一期缝合的CEA相比的效果,以及用于颈动脉补片血管成形术的不同材料的效果。

方法

纳入的随机试验需比较在接受CEA的任何患者中颈动脉补片血管成形术与一期缝合,或一种类型的颈动脉补片与另一种类型的颈动脉补片。

结果

共确定了13项符合条件的随机试验。7项试验涉及1281例手术,比较了一期缝合与常规补片缝合,8项试验涉及1480例手术,比较了不同的补片材料(2项研究同时比较了两者)。补片血管成形术与任何类型卒中风险的降低相关(P = 0.004),同侧卒中风险降低(P = 0.001),围手术期(P = 0.007)和长期随访期间(P = 0.004)的卒中或死亡风险降低。补片血管成形术还与围手术期动脉闭塞风险降低相关(P = 0.0001),以及长期随访期间再狭窄风险降低相关(P < 0.0001)。7项比较不同补片类型的试验显示,围手术期或1年随访时,卒中、死亡或动脉再狭窄风险无差异。一项对180例患者(200条动脉)的研究比较了胶原浸渍涤纶(Hemashield)补片与聚四氟乙烯补片。与聚四氟乙烯相比,涤纶补片在30天时卒中风险显著增加(P = 0.02),卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作联合风险增加(P = 0.03),再狭窄风险增加(P = 0.01),且晚期再狭窄大于50%的风险增加(P < 0.001)。

结论

颈动脉补片血管成形术可降低围手术期死亡或卒中风险,以及同侧缺血性卒中的长期风险。需要更多数据来确定各种补片材料之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验