Hofmann Robert, Steinwender Clemens, Kammler Jürgen, Kypta Alex, Wimmer Gottfried, Leisch Franz
Cardiovascular Division, City Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Nov 30;116(21-22):744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-004-0264-0.
The clinical course of patients with advanced organic heart disease is often complicated by the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Slowing the ventricular rate and, if possible, restoration of normal sinus rhythm is crucial but difficult in the state of decreased ventricular function.
We included 78 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and heart rate above 135 beats min(-1) in an observational, uncontrolled study in the coronary care unit of a tertiary care center. Thirty-nine patients suffered from advanced congestive heart failure, 26 patients had pulmonary edema, and 13 patients were in cardiogenic shock. All patients were treated with 450 mg amiodarone given as a single intravenous bolus through a peripheral venous access without further infusion. Ventricular heart rate and cardiac rhythm were measured within 30 minutes after drug administration. Cardiac rhythm was monitored for 24 hours. The site of venous access was examined 30 minutes after drug administration and every 6 hours until the needle was removed after a maximum of 48 hours.
Twenty-five patients (32%) converted to normal sinus rhythm within 30 minutes. Another 15 (19%) reverted into sinus rhythm during the following 24 hours. Within 30 minutes after amiodarone administration, ventricular heart rate decreased significantly from 152 +/- 12 to 88 +/- 17 (p < 0.0001) beats min(-1) in patients who converted to sinus rhythm and from 157 +/- 14 to 98 +/- 16 beats min(-1) in patients who did not. The degree of reduction in heart rate was similar among patients presenting with exacerbated congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock. Systolic blood pressure decreased in two patients, from 115 to 80 mmHg and from 130 to 100 mmHg, but was reversible after 10 and 90 minutes respectively without specific intervention. No proarrhythmia or clinical relevant bradycardia was observed, and no inflammation detected at the site of venous access.
Amiodarone, given as a single intravenous bolus through a peripheral vein rapidly reduced ventricular rate and was well tolerated in patients with atrial fibrillation, even in the presence of congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
晚期器质性心脏病患者的临床病程常因房颤的发生而复杂化。在心室功能下降的情况下,减慢心室率并尽可能恢复正常窦性心律至关重要,但也很困难。
我们在一家三级医疗中心的冠心病监护病房进行了一项观察性、非对照研究,纳入了78例连续的房颤患者,其心率高于135次/分钟。39例患者患有晚期充血性心力衰竭,26例患者有肺水肿,13例患者处于心源性休克。所有患者均通过外周静脉通路单次静脉推注450 mg胺碘酮,不再进行进一步输注。在给药后30分钟内测量心室心率和心律。对心律进行24小时监测。在给药后30分钟检查静脉穿刺部位,此后每6小时检查一次,直至最多48小时后拔除针头。
25例患者(32%)在30分钟内转为正常窦性心律。另有15例(19%)在接下来的24小时内恢复窦性心律。在胺碘酮给药后30分钟内,转为窦性心律的患者心室心率从152±12显著降至88±17(p<0.0001)次/分钟,未转为窦性心律的患者心室心率从157±14降至98±16次/分钟。在出现充血性心力衰竭加重、肺水肿或心源性休克的患者中,心率降低程度相似。两名患者收缩压下降,分别从115 mmHg降至80 mmHg和从130 mmHg降至100 mmHg,但分别在10分钟和90分钟后无需特殊干预即可恢复。未观察到促心律失常或临床相关的心动过缓,静脉穿刺部位未检测到炎症。
通过外周静脉单次静脉推注胺碘酮可迅速降低房颤患者的心室率,且耐受性良好,即使存在充血性心力衰竭和心源性休克。