• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学与科学报告的商业化。

The commercialisation of medical and scientific reporting.

作者信息

Caulfield Timothy

机构信息

Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2004 Dec;1(3):e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010038.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0010038
PMID:15630461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC539042/
Abstract

Commercial influences on research results can in turn lead to "hype" in science and medicine news stories

摘要

商业对研究结果的影响反过来可能导致科学和医学新闻报道中的“炒作”

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faa1/539042/0790fb918f76/pmed.0010038.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faa1/539042/0790fb918f76/pmed.0010038.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faa1/539042/0790fb918f76/pmed.0010038.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The commercialisation of medical and scientific reporting.医学与科学报告的商业化。
PLoS Med. 2004 Dec;1(3):e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010038.
2
Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.生物技术与大众媒体：炒作与科学的推销
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jul;22(7):337-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.014.
3
Science and the sources of hype.科学与炒作的根源。
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(3-4):209-17. doi: 10.1159/000336533. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
4
Marketplace language harms health care.市场用语对医疗保健有害。
Hosp Prog. 1979 Oct;60(10):6, 10.
5
To sell science, find out what people want to buy.
Nature. 2002 Jun 20;417(6891):787. doi: 10.1038/417787b.
6
Perception or reality?感知还是现实？
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;28(6):399-400.
7
Retail health clinics are rolling your way.零售医疗诊所正向你走来。
Fam Pract Manag. 2006 May;13(5):65-72.
8
Image of nursing.护理形象。
Tar Heel Nurse. 2006 Apr-Jun;68(2):28.
9
Participating in science outreach: a civic responsibility for scientists.参与科学推广：科学家的公民责任。
Mol Interv. 2001 Aug;1(3):138-40.
10
Marketing medicine to the public: a reader's guide.向公众推销药品：读者指南
JAMA. 2002 Feb 13;287(6):774-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond belief: a cross-genre study on perception and validation of health information online.难以置信：一项关于在线健康信息认知与验证的跨领域研究
Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022;13(4):299-314. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00310-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior.认知增强：人类心理学和社会行为的未解之谜
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Mar 23;27(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w.
3
Cancer News Coverage in Korean Newspapers: An Analytic Study in Terms of Cancer Awareness.

本文引用的文献

1
Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers.印刷媒体会对基因研究进行“炒作”吗？报纸报道与同行评审研究论文的比较。
CMAJ. 2004 Apr 27;170(9):1399-407. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1030762.
2
Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.医学和外科随机试验中行业资助与具有统计学意义的支持行业的研究结果之间的关联。
CMAJ. 2004 Feb 17;170(4):477-80.
3
Hype in health reporting: "checkbook science" buys distortion of medical news.
韩国报纸中的癌症新闻报道：一项关于癌症认知度的分析研究。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 Mar;53(2):126-134. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.19.256. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Figure Interpretation Assessment Tool-Health (FIAT-health) 2.0: from a scoring instrument to a critical appraisal tool.图表解读评估工具-健康版（FIAT-health）2.0：从评分工具到评价工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 23;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0797-6.
5
Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey.公众与医疗保健专业人员对健康信息认知的差异：非概率抽样问卷调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 3;21(7):e14105. doi: 10.2196/14105.
6
Statistics in Dutch policy debates on health and healthcare.荷兰卫生和医疗保健政策辩论中的统计学。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 3;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0461-y.
7
Improving interpretation of publically reported statistics on health and healthcare: the Figure Interpretation Assessment Tool (FIAT-Health).提高对公共卫生和医疗保健统计数据的解读能力：图形解读评估工具（FIAT-Health）。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 7;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0279-z.
8
The Association Between Internet Use and Ambulatory Care-Seeking Behaviors in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study.台湾地区互联网使用与门诊就医行为之间的关联：一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 7;18(12):e319. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5498.
9
Academics and competing interests in H1N1 influenza media reporting.甲型 H1N1 流感媒体报道中的学术界和利益冲突。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):197-203. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203128. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Contemporary neuroscience in the media.当代神经科学在媒体中的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):725-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(2):383-9. doi: 10.2190/PMM9-DPUT-HN3Y-LMJQ.
4
Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs.新闻中的药物：加拿大报纸对新处方药报道的分析
CMAJ. 2003 Apr 29;168(9):1133-7.
5
Underwhelmed: hyperbole, regulatory policy, and the genetic revolution.意兴阑珊：夸张言辞、监管政策与基因革命
McGill Law J. 2000 May;45(2):437-60.
6
Conflicts of interest: can you believe what you read?利益冲突：你能相信你所读到的内容吗？
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):360-3. doi: 10.1038/416360a.
7
The media and public reaction to genetic research.媒体和公众对基因研究的反应。
JAMA. 2002 Feb 13;287(6):773.
8
Sensationalism in the media: when scientists and journalists may be complicit collaborators.媒体中的耸人听闻：科学家与记者何时可能成为同谋
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):185-8.
9
Beyond risk. Reporting about genetics in the post-Asilomar press.超越风险。阿西洛马会议后媒体对遗传学的报道。
Perspect Biol Med. 2001 Spring;44(2):199-207. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2001.0032.
10
Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications.新闻媒体对药物益处和风险的报道。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 1;342(22):1645-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006013422206.