Firstenberg-Eden Ruth, Foti Debra, McDougal Susan, Beck Stephen
BioSys, Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, USA.
J Food Prot. 2004 Dec;67(12):2760-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2760.
Coliform counts in a variety of foods, including dairy products (raw milk, pasteurized milk, yogurt, butter, and ice cream), meats (pork sausage, ground beef, and raw chicken), raw eggs, and chocolate, were performed by the rapid automated BioSys optical assay and the conventional method with violet red bile agar (VRBA). The standard deviation (SD) among five replicate counts for the optical assay was similar to or better than that obtained with VRBA plates for all foods tested. The average SD for all foods tested was 0.21 for the optical assay and 0.30 for the VRBA plates. At very low concentrations of coliforms (1 to 10 CFU/ml for liquid products and 10 to 100 CFU/g for solid samples), the average SDs were 0.26 and 0.47, respectively. The optical assay was less susceptible to interference by noncoliform organisms. In naturally contaminated samples, bacteria such as Serratia liquefaciens, Pantoea spp., Vibrio fluvialis, Aeromonas hydrophilia, and Pseudomonas spp. formed typical colonies in VRBA, resulting in false-positive results or a need to verify colonies in brilliant green lactose broth. The optical assay appeared to be more selective than the VRBA conventional method, detecting fewer noncoliforms. There was close agreement in test results between the two methods, as indicated by correlation coefficients of 0.92 to 0.99 obtained for the regression analysis of the two methods. In most cases both methods distinguished accurately between positive samples containing coliforms and negative controls. All products tested using the automated BioSys Optical Assay for coliforms yielded results more quickly (typically 10 to 12 h) than did those tested with the conventional VRBA method (24 to 72 h with confirmation).
采用快速自动化BioSys光学检测法和使用紫红胆盐琼脂(VRBA)的传统方法,对包括乳制品(生牛奶、巴氏杀菌牛奶、酸奶、黄油和冰淇淋)、肉类(猪肉香肠、碎牛肉和生鸡肉)、生鸡蛋和巧克力在内的多种食品中的大肠菌群进行计数。对于所有测试食品,光学检测法五次重复计数的标准偏差(SD)与VRBA平板法获得的标准偏差相似或更低。所有测试食品的光学检测法平均SD为0.21,VRBA平板法为0.30。在大肠菌群浓度非常低的情况下(液体产品为1至10 CFU/ml,固体样品为10至100 CFU/g),平均SD分别为0.26和0.47。光学检测法较不易受到非大肠菌群微生物的干扰。在天然污染的样品中,诸如液化沙雷氏菌、泛菌属、河流弧菌、嗜水气单胞菌和假单胞菌属等细菌在VRBA中形成典型菌落,导致假阳性结果或需要在亮绿乳糖肉汤中验证菌落。光学检测法似乎比VRBA传统方法更具选择性,检测到的非大肠菌群更少。两种方法的测试结果高度一致,两种方法回归分析的相关系数为0.92至0.99。在大多数情况下,两种方法都能准确区分含有大肠菌群的阳性样品和阴性对照。使用自动化BioSys大肠菌群光学检测法测试的所有产品比使用传统VRBA方法测试的产品(确认需24至72小时)更快得出结果(通常为10至12小时)。