• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BioSys光学检测法与紫红胆盐琼脂法在食品中大肠菌群检测方面的性能比较。

Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.

作者信息

Firstenberg-Eden Ruth, Foti Debra, McDougal Susan, Beck Stephen

机构信息

BioSys, Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2004 Dec;67(12):2760-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2760.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2760
PMID:15633683
Abstract

Coliform counts in a variety of foods, including dairy products (raw milk, pasteurized milk, yogurt, butter, and ice cream), meats (pork sausage, ground beef, and raw chicken), raw eggs, and chocolate, were performed by the rapid automated BioSys optical assay and the conventional method with violet red bile agar (VRBA). The standard deviation (SD) among five replicate counts for the optical assay was similar to or better than that obtained with VRBA plates for all foods tested. The average SD for all foods tested was 0.21 for the optical assay and 0.30 for the VRBA plates. At very low concentrations of coliforms (1 to 10 CFU/ml for liquid products and 10 to 100 CFU/g for solid samples), the average SDs were 0.26 and 0.47, respectively. The optical assay was less susceptible to interference by noncoliform organisms. In naturally contaminated samples, bacteria such as Serratia liquefaciens, Pantoea spp., Vibrio fluvialis, Aeromonas hydrophilia, and Pseudomonas spp. formed typical colonies in VRBA, resulting in false-positive results or a need to verify colonies in brilliant green lactose broth. The optical assay appeared to be more selective than the VRBA conventional method, detecting fewer noncoliforms. There was close agreement in test results between the two methods, as indicated by correlation coefficients of 0.92 to 0.99 obtained for the regression analysis of the two methods. In most cases both methods distinguished accurately between positive samples containing coliforms and negative controls. All products tested using the automated BioSys Optical Assay for coliforms yielded results more quickly (typically 10 to 12 h) than did those tested with the conventional VRBA method (24 to 72 h with confirmation).

摘要

采用快速自动化BioSys光学检测法和使用紫红胆盐琼脂(VRBA)的传统方法,对包括乳制品(生牛奶、巴氏杀菌牛奶、酸奶、黄油和冰淇淋)、肉类(猪肉香肠、碎牛肉和生鸡肉)、生鸡蛋和巧克力在内的多种食品中的大肠菌群进行计数。对于所有测试食品,光学检测法五次重复计数的标准偏差(SD)与VRBA平板法获得的标准偏差相似或更低。所有测试食品的光学检测法平均SD为0.21,VRBA平板法为0.30。在大肠菌群浓度非常低的情况下(液体产品为1至10 CFU/ml,固体样品为10至100 CFU/g),平均SD分别为0.26和0.47。光学检测法较不易受到非大肠菌群微生物的干扰。在天然污染的样品中,诸如液化沙雷氏菌、泛菌属、河流弧菌、嗜水气单胞菌和假单胞菌属等细菌在VRBA中形成典型菌落,导致假阳性结果或需要在亮绿乳糖肉汤中验证菌落。光学检测法似乎比VRBA传统方法更具选择性,检测到的非大肠菌群更少。两种方法的测试结果高度一致,两种方法回归分析的相关系数为0.92至0.99。在大多数情况下,两种方法都能准确区分含有大肠菌群的阳性样品和阴性对照。使用自动化BioSys大肠菌群光学检测法测试的所有产品比使用传统VRBA方法测试的产品(确认需24至72小时)更快得出结果(通常为10至12小时)。

相似文献

1
Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.BioSys光学检测法与紫红胆盐琼脂法在食品中大肠菌群检测方面的性能比较。
J Food Prot. 2004 Dec;67(12):2760-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2760.
2
Comparison of the SimPlate coliform and Escherichia coli test with Petrifilm, three-tube MPN, and VRBA + MUG methods for enumerating coliforms and E. coli in food.用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的SimPlate大肠菌群和大肠杆菌检测方法与Petrifilm、三管MPN法以及VRBA + MUG法的比较。
J Food Prot. 1998 Apr;61(4):444-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.4.444.
3
Evaluation of Peel Plate™ EC for Determination of E. coli and Coliform or Total Coliform in Dairy Products.评估Peel Plate™ EC用于测定乳制品中的大肠杆菌、大肠菌群或总大肠菌群。
J AOAC Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;99(1):153-69. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.15-0254. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Evaluation of the Petrifilm rapid coliform count plate method for coliform enumeration from surimi-based imitation crab slurry.用于从鱼糜基仿蟹肉浆中进行大肠菌群计数的Petrifilm快速大肠菌群计数平板法的评估。
J Food Prot. 2000 Jan;63(1):123-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.1.123.
5
High-sensitivity dry rehydratable film method for enumeration of coliforms in dairy products: collaborative study.
J AOAC Int. 1997 May-Jun;80(3):505-16.
6
Evaluation of an optical microbiological method for rapidly estimating populations of aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from ground pork.
J Food Prot. 2001 May;64(5):669-73. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.5.669.
7
A new alginate-based rapid method for determining coliforms in milk.
J Food Prot. 2003 Nov;66(11):2146-50. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.11.2146.
8
Survival and detection of coliforms, Enterobacteriaceae, and gram-negative bacteria in Greek yogurt.希腊酸奶中大肠菌群、肠杆菌科细菌和革兰氏阴性菌的存活与检测
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Feb;100(2):950-960. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11553. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
9
Use of Petrifilm™ to Evaluate the Microflora of Frozen Dessert Mixes .
J Food Prot. 1989 Aug;52(8):549-551. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.8.549.
10
Efficacy of chromocult coliform agar for coliform and Escherichia coil detection in foods.chromocult大肠菌群琼脂用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌检测的效能
J Food Prot. 2000 Apr;63(4):539-41. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.4.539.

引用本文的文献

1
Soleris®Enterobacteriaceae for the Detection of Enterobacteriaceae in Select Foods: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 121901.Soleris®肠杆菌科检测法用于检测特定食品中的肠杆菌科:AOAC 性能验证方法 121901。
J AOAC Int. 2020 Jul 1;103(4):1081-1089. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa001.