• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的SimPlate大肠菌群和大肠杆菌检测方法与Petrifilm、三管MPN法以及VRBA + MUG法的比较。

Comparison of the SimPlate coliform and Escherichia coli test with Petrifilm, three-tube MPN, and VRBA + MUG methods for enumerating coliforms and E. coli in food.

作者信息

Townsend D E, Irving R L, Naqui A

机构信息

IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook, ME 04092-2041, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 1998 Apr;61(4):444-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.4.444.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028x-61.4.444
PMID:9709208
Abstract

SimPlate for coliforms and Escherichia coli (CEc) is a new method for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in food. Internal validation of the method was carried out at IDEXX Laboratories (Westbrook, ME) with 180 food samples representing a variety of different food matrices and compared against three-tube MPN (most probable number), VRBA (violet red bile agar) + MUG, and Petrifilm (E. coli count) methods. SimPlate CEc was highly correlated with each of these methods for the quantification of coliform bacteria (r > or = 0.90). An insignificant number of food samples were found to contain E. coli; therefore, no meaningful correlation data could be generated. Four hundred forty-four additional food samples were tested at five collaborating laboratories for the presence of coliforms E. coli using SimPlate CEc and either VRBA + MUG or Petrifilm (E. coli count). Regression analysis of data from SimPlate for CEc versus Petrifilm E. coli count plates generated correlation coefficients (r) of at least 0.89 for total coliforms and at least 0.90 for generic E. coli. Correlation coefficients between SimPlate for CEc and VRBA + MUG data were at least 0.90 for coliforms and at least 0.86 for E. coli. SimPlate for CEc demonstrated better recovery of E. coli than Petrifilm when high populations of bacteria were present. E. coli was not detected in 20 or 50 (40%) raw milk samples tested by the Petrifilm method due to the presence of interfering coliform and noncoliform bacteria. It is concluded that SimPlate for CEc is a suitable alternative for determining numbers of coliform bacteria and E. coli in food.

摘要

用于检测和定量食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的SimPlate(CEc)是一种新方法。该方法在IDEXX实验室(缅因州韦斯特布鲁克)进行了内部验证,使用了180个代表各种不同食品基质的食品样本,并与三管MPN(最可能数)、VRBA(紫红胆盐琼脂)+MUG和Petrifilm(大肠杆菌计数)方法进行了比较。SimPlate CEc与这些方法中的每一种在定量大肠菌群方面都高度相关(r≥0.90)。发现少量食品样本含有大肠杆菌;因此,无法生成有意义的相关性数据。另外444个食品样本在五个合作实验室使用SimPlate CEc以及VRBA+MUG或Petrifilm(大肠杆菌计数)检测大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的存在情况。对CEc的SimPlate与Petrifilm大肠杆菌计数平板的数据进行回归分析,得出总大肠菌群的相关系数(r)至少为0.89,普通大肠杆菌的相关系数至少为0.90。CEc的SimPlate与VRBA+MUG数据之间的相关系数,大肠菌群至少为0.90,大肠杆菌至少为0.86。当存在大量细菌时,CEc的SimPlate对大肠杆菌的回收率比Petrifilm更好。用Petrifilm方法检测的20个或50个(40%)生牛奶样本中未检测到大肠杆菌,原因是存在干扰性的大肠菌群和非大肠菌群细菌。结论是,CEc的SimPlate是测定食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌数量的合适替代方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the SimPlate coliform and Escherichia coli test with Petrifilm, three-tube MPN, and VRBA + MUG methods for enumerating coliforms and E. coli in food.用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的SimPlate大肠菌群和大肠杆菌检测方法与Petrifilm、三管MPN法以及VRBA + MUG法的比较。
J Food Prot. 1998 Apr;61(4):444-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.4.444.
2
Enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli in foods by the SimPlate coliform and E. coli color indicator method and conventional culture methods: collaborative study.
J AOAC Int. 2005 Sep-Oct;88(5):1318-33.
3
Comparison of the traditional three-tube most probable number method with the Petrifilm, SimPlate, BioSys optical, and Bactometer conductance methods for enumerating Escherichia coli from chicken carcasses and ground beef.传统三管最大可能数法与Petrifilm、SimPlate、BioSys光学法和Bactometer电导法用于鸡胴体和碎牛肉中大肠杆菌计数的比较。
J Food Prot. 2000 Sep;63(9):1179-83. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.9.1179.
4
Evaluation of the Petrifilm rapid coliform count plate method for coliform enumeration from surimi-based imitation crab slurry.用于从鱼糜基仿蟹肉浆中进行大肠菌群计数的Petrifilm快速大肠菌群计数平板法的评估。
J Food Prot. 2000 Jan;63(1):123-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.1.123.
5
[Comparison between the standard MPN method recommended by the American Public Health Association and the Simplate and Petrifilm methods for identification of the coliform group and Escherichia coli in tilapia (Oreochromis sp) originating from aquaculture in fresh water].[美国公共卫生协会推荐的标准MPN方法与Simplate和Petrifilm方法用于鉴定源自淡水养殖罗非鱼(奥利亚罗非鱼)中的大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的比较]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2000 Jan-Mar;32(1):15-9.
6
Enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from pre- and post-chilled pork and lamb carcasses using 3M™ Petrifilm™ Select E. coli and Simplate® Coliforms/E. coli.使用3M™ Petrifilm™ 大肠杆菌选择培养基和Simplate® 大肠菌群/大肠杆菌检测预冷和冷却后的猪肉及羊肉胴体拭子样本中的大肠杆菌数量。
Meat Sci. 2017 Aug;130:26-29. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Comparison of Petrifilm method to conventional methods for enumerating aerobic bacteria, coliforms, Escherichia coli and yeasts and molds in foods.用于食品中需氧菌、大肠菌群、大肠杆菌以及酵母菌和霉菌计数的Petrifilm方法与传统方法的比较。
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 1995;42(3):255-9.
8
Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.BioSys光学检测法与紫红胆盐琼脂法在食品中大肠菌群检测方面的性能比较。
J Food Prot. 2004 Dec;67(12):2760-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2760.
9
Comparison of the SimPlate total plate count method with Petrifilm, Redigel, conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods.SimPlate 总平板计数法与Petrifilm、Redigel以及传统倾注平板法在食品中需氧微生物计数方面的比较。
J Food Prot. 1998 Jan;61(1):14-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.1.14.
10
Enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli in frozen black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by conventional and rapid methods.采用传统方法和快速方法对冷冻斑节对虾中的大肠菌群和大肠杆菌进行计数。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Mar 15;81(2):113-21. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00190-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Occurrence of foodborne bacteria in Alberta feedlots.艾伯塔省饲养场中食源细菌的出现情况。
Can Vet J. 2009 Feb;50(2):166-72.