Festa Marino S, Tibby Shane M, Taylor Dan, Durward Andrew, Habibi Parviz, Murdoch Ian A
Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149132.51906.13.
Mortality from meningococcal disease typically occurs within 24 hrs of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. An early, accurate mortality-risk tool may aid in trial design for novel therapies. We assessed the performance of two generic scores that assign mortality risk within 1 hr of ICU admission: the Preintensive Care Pediatric Risk of Mortality (Pre-ICU PRISM) and Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM).
Prospective, observational study over 21 months.
Two tertiary pediatric ICUs accepting referrals from southeast England.
Patients were 165 consecutive children with meningococcal disease. Ages ranged from 0.1 to 17 yrs (median 2.3 yrs).
None.
PIM demonstrated greater sensibility, with complete data collected in 93% of cases, compared with 35% for the pre-ICU PRISM. Both scores discriminated well. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.00) for PIM and 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.98) for Pre-ICU PRISM; this did not change when applied to the subgroup of patients with complete data. Both scores calibrated poorly, overestimating mortality in the medium-risk strata (and also in the high-risk stratum in the case of Pre-ICU PRISM). When used as a stratification tool for a hypothetical trial (60% reduction in mortality, 80% power), the scores allowed for a reduction in study size by 50% (PIM) and 43% (pre-ICU PRISM).
Pre-ICU PRISM and PIM both discriminate well but calibrate poorly when applied to a cohort of children with meningococcal sepsis. Both scores provide an effective means of stratification for clinical trial purposes. The main advantage for PIM appears to be ease of data collection.
脑膜炎球菌病导致的死亡通常发生在重症监护病房(ICU)收治后的24小时内。一种早期、准确的死亡风险评估工具可能有助于新型疗法的试验设计。我们评估了两种在ICU收治后1小时内评估死亡风险的通用评分系统的性能:重症监护前儿科死亡风险(Pre-ICU PRISM)和儿科死亡指数(PIM)。
为期21个月的前瞻性观察性研究。
接收来自英格兰东南部转诊患者的两家三级儿科ICU。
连续纳入165例患脑膜炎球菌病的儿童。年龄范围为0.1至17岁(中位数2.3岁)。
无。
PIM表现出更高的敏感性,93%的病例收集到了完整数据,而Pre-ICU PRISM为35%。两种评分系统的区分度都很好。PIM的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.90(95%置信区间,0.81 - 1.00),Pre-ICU PRISM为0.94(95%置信区间,0.88 - 0.98);应用于有完整数据的患者亚组时,这一结果未发生变化。两种评分系统都校准不佳,在中等风险分层中高估了死亡率(Pre-ICU PRISM在高风险分层中也是如此)。当用作假设性试验(死亡率降低60%,检验效能80%)的分层工具时,这些评分系统可使研究样本量减少50%(PIM)和43%(Pre-ICU PRISM)。
Pre-ICU PRISM和PIM在应用于一组患脑膜炎球菌败血症的儿童时,区分度都很好,但校准不佳。两种评分系统都为临床试验提供了有效的分层方法。PIM的主要优势似乎在于数据收集简便。