Campbell Justin S, Elison Jeff
Department of Mental Health, Law, & Policy, University of South Florida, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2005 Feb;84(1):96-104. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_16.
The convergent validity of the primary and secondary psychopathy scales of the Levenson, Kiehl, and Fitzpatrick (1995) Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRPS) were investigated by contrasting correlations between the two SRPS scales and self-report adaptive and maladaptive shame coping scales. The results, from a sample of 305 undergraduates, supported the convergent validity of the SRPS primary (selfish, uncaring, manipulative interpersonal style) and secondary (impulsivity and self-defeating behavior) scales; both possessed small but significant negative relationships with adaptive shame coping and small but significant positive relationships with externalizing shame coping. An opposing pattern of convergent validity was evidenced by partial correlations (controlling for SPRS scale covariance) that indicated the SRPS primary scale had a negative relationship and the secondary scale had a positive relationship to internalizing shame coping.
通过对比莱文森、基尔和菲茨帕特里克（1995年）的《自陈式心理变态量表》（SRPS）的原发性和继发性心理变态量表与自陈式适应性和适应不良羞耻应对量表之间的相关性，对该量表的收敛效度进行了研究。来自305名本科生样本的结果支持了SRPS原发性量表（自私、冷漠、操纵性的人际风格）和继发性量表（冲动性和自我挫败行为）的收敛效度；两者与适应性羞耻应对均呈小而显著的负相关，与外化性羞耻应对均呈小而显著的正相关。偏相关（控制SPRS量表协方差）证明了收敛效度的相反模式，表明SRPS原发性量表与内化性羞耻应对呈负相关，继发性量表与内化性羞耻应对呈正相关。
