• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机制数据与癌症风险评估:对定量分子终点的需求

Mechanistic data and cancer risk assessment: the need for quantitative molecular endpoints.

作者信息

Preston R Julian

机构信息

Environmental Carcinogenesis Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.

出版信息

Environ Mol Mutagen. 2005 Mar-Apr;45(2-3):214-21. doi: 10.1002/em.20093.

DOI:10.1002/em.20093
PMID:15645441
Abstract

The cancer risk assessment process as currently proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency allows for the use of mechanistic data to inform the low-dose tumor response in humans and in laboratory animals. The aim is to reduce the reliance on defaults that introduce a relatively high level of uncertainty to the risk estimates. The types of data required for this purpose are those that help identify key events in tumor formation following exposure to environmental chemicals. Informative biomarkers of tumor responses could then be developed for describing the shape of a dose-response curve at low doses (i.e., a qualitative assessment) and for predicting tumor frequency at these low doses (i.e., a quantitative assessment). A number of recently developed molecular approaches could aid in the development of qualitatively and quantitatively informative biomarkers. An overview of these with examples of their use is presented. These methods include quantitative gene expression array techniques, quantitative proteomic assays, and the assessment of DNA alterations at the single gene level and at the genome level of detection. It is most likely that a combination of approaches at different levels of cellular organization (i.e., DNA, RNA, and protein) will be the most productive for biomarker development. The rapid progress that is being made will make this tool kit even more applicable for the cancer risk assessment process.

摘要

美国环境保护局目前提出的癌症风险评估流程允许使用机制数据来了解人类和实验动物的低剂量肿瘤反应。目的是减少对那些给风险评估带来较高不确定性的默认值的依赖。为此所需的数据类型是有助于识别接触环境化学物质后肿瘤形成关键事件的数据。然后可以开发肿瘤反应的信息性生物标志物,用于描述低剂量下剂量反应曲线的形状(即定性评估)以及预测这些低剂量下的肿瘤频率(即定量评估)。一些最近开发的分子方法有助于开发定性和定量的信息性生物标志物。本文将对这些方法及其应用实例进行概述。这些方法包括定量基因表达阵列技术、定量蛋白质组学分析以及在单基因水平和基因组检测水平上对DNA改变的评估。不同细胞组织水平(即DNA、RNA和蛋白质)的方法组合很可能对生物标志物的开发最有成效。正在取得的快速进展将使这个工具包在癌症风险评估过程中更适用。

相似文献

1
Mechanistic data and cancer risk assessment: the need for quantitative molecular endpoints.机制数据与癌症风险评估:对定量分子终点的需求
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2005 Mar-Apr;45(2-3):214-21. doi: 10.1002/em.20093.
2
Cancer risk assessment for 1,3-butadiene: data integration opportunities.1,3 - 丁二烯的癌症风险评估:数据整合机会
Chem Biol Interact. 2007 Mar 20;166(1-3):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
3
Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.通过运用特定知识取代默认选项来降低风险评估中的不确定性。
Drug Metab Rev. 1996 Feb-May;28(1-2):149-79. doi: 10.3109/03602539608993997.
4
Application of transcriptional benchmark dose values in quantitative cancer and noncancer risk assessment.转录基准剂量值在定量癌症和非癌症风险评估中的应用。
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Mar;120(1):194-205. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq355. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
5
Analysis of in vivo mutation data can inform cancer risk assessment.体内突变数据分析可为癌症风险评估提供信息。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;51(2):151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
6
Cancer risk assessment: importance of identifying mechanisms of action.癌症风险评估:识别作用机制的重要性。
J Am Water Works Assoc. 1990 Oct;82(10):57-60.
7
Quantitation of molecular endpoints for the dose-response component of cancer risk assessment.
Toxicol Pathol. 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):112-6. doi: 10.1080/01926230252824798.
8
Approaches to cancer assessment in EPA's Integrated Risk Information System.EPA 的综合风险信息系统中的癌症评估方法。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Jul 15;254(2):170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.10.019. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
9
Quantitative approaches to human risk assessment for noncancer health effects.非癌症健康影响的人类风险评估定量方法。
Neurotoxicology. 1990 Summer;11(2):189-98.
10
A classification framework and practical guidance for establishing a mode of action for chemical carcinogens.化学致癌物作用模式的分类框架及实用指南。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;45(1):9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting.人类癌症表现出突变型表型:起源、后果和靶向治疗。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(6):450-7. doi: 10.1038/nrc3063. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
Combined toxic exposures and human health: biomarkers of exposure and effect.联合毒性暴露与人类健康:暴露和效应的生物标志物。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):629-47. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8030629. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
3
Advances in chemical carcinogenesis: a historical review and prospective.化学致癌作用的进展:历史回顾与展望
Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 1;68(17):6863-72. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2852.