Suppr超能文献

自动移动床对比增强三维磁共振血管造影(auto-moving table contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA)与碘化对比剂增强数字减影血管造影(iodinated contrast-enhanced DSA)在评估下肢动脉方面的比较。

Comparison of auto-moving table contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA and iodinated contrast-enhanced DSA for evaluating the lower-extremity arteries.

作者信息

Ho Cheng-Feng, Wu Mei-Han, Wu Hsiu-Mei, Chang Cheng-Yeng, Chen Margaret Chia-Mei, Chou Ting-Ywan

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Catholic Cardinal Tien Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2004 Oct;67(10):511-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to compare diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (3-D MRA) with that of the conventional x-ray iodinated digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive diseases (PAOD).

METHODS

Twenty patients with a clinical diagnosis of PAOD participated in this study. All patients were evaluated with both contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA and conventional x-ray iodinated DSA for the arteries of their lower extremities. The DSA was performed by a selective catheterization into the bilateral common or superficial femoral arteries, whereas 3-D MRA was performed with an auto-moving table covering the vascular tree from aorta to the arteries of ankle regions with 1 bolus injection of a triple-dose (0.3 mmol/kg) contrast medium. The arteries were divided into 23 anatomic segments and graded by their appearance on a 1-4 scale (1 = normal, 4 = total occlusion or no visible vessel). Evaluators also compared the images of 3-D MRA with those of the conventional x-ray iodinated DSA (as gold standard) with respect to image quality.

RESULTS

There was a high agreement (k = 0.6-1.0) between 2 observers' interpretations of the images obtained from 3-D MRA and conventional DSA. The agreement within each observer was moderate to fair (k = 0.32-0.57), and the better agreement was found with the images above knee level than those below knee level. As for the image quality of 3-D MRA, the frequencies of showing a similar image quality were 57.5%, 55%, and 37.5% at the aortofemoral, femoropopliteal, and distal leg levels, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The main problem of the 3-D contrast enhanced MRA was the returned venous contamination of the image. It was particularly problematic for the areas below knee level. MRA can provide an initial evaluation for patients with PAOD, but cannot substitute for the conventional DSA as a precise diagnostic image modality for peripheral vascular diseases, especially for the distal legs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较对比增强三维磁共振血管造影(3-D MRA)与传统X线碘剂数字减影血管造影(DSA)对外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)患者的诊断效能。

方法

20例临床诊断为PAOD的患者参与本研究。所有患者均接受下肢动脉的对比增强3-D MRA和传统X线碘剂DSA检查。DSA通过选择性导管插入双侧股总动脉或股浅动脉进行,而3-D MRA则使用自动移动检查床,通过一次团注三倍剂量(0.3 mmol/kg)造影剂覆盖从主动脉到踝区动脉的血管树。动脉被分为23个解剖节段,并根据其外观按1-4级进行分级(1 = 正常,4 = 完全闭塞或未见血管)。评估者还就图像质量将3-D MRA图像与传统X线碘剂DSA图像(作为金标准)进行比较。

结果

两位观察者对3-D MRA和传统DSA所获图像的解读之间存在高度一致性(k = 0.6 - 1.0)。每位观察者内部的一致性为中等至尚可(k = 0.32 - 0.57),且发现膝关节以上水平的图像一致性优于膝关节以下水平的图像。至于3-D MRA的图像质量,在腹主动脉-股动脉、股动脉-腘动脉和小腿远端水平显示相似图像质量的频率分别为57.5%、55%和37.5%。

结论

三维对比增强MRA的主要问题是图像的静脉回流污染。这在膝关节以下区域尤为突出。MRA可为PAOD患者提供初步评估,但不能替代传统DSA作为外周血管疾病的精确诊断成像方式,尤其是对于小腿远端。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验