Kreitner Karl-Friedrich, Kunz R Peter, Herber Sascha, Martenstein Sonja, Dorweiler Bernhard, Dueber Christoph
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jan;27(1):78-85. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21226.
To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MR angiography (i.e., contrast-enhanced MRA [CE-MRA]) of the pedal vasculature with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).
A total of 22 patients with PAOD were prospectively examined at 1.5T. For contrast enhancement, 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-BOPTA were applied. MRA consisted of dynamic imaging with acquisition of six consecutive data sets. Acquisition time for each data set was 24 seconds, voxel size was 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.3 mm(3). A total of 20 out of 22 patient underwent selective DSA, two patients fine-needle DSA. DSA and MRA were performed within seven days. Image analysis was independently done by two observers with assessment of overall image quality, motion artifacts, detection of patent vessel segments of the distal calf and pedal vessels, and the number of patent metatarsal arteries. After four weeks, a consensus reading of DSA images was done. A second consensus reading of CE-MRA was performed after a further six weeks.
Consensus readings of MRA and DSA revealed higher image quality and fewer motion artifacts for MRA (P = 0.021 and P = 0.008, respectively, sign test); interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.78) for image quality, and moderate (kappa = 0.46) for motion artifacts. There were no differences between CE-MRA and DSA in detecting patent vessel segments with a high degree of agreement (kappa = 0.89), and interobserver agreement for MRA was substantial (kappa = 0.89). Significantly more vessels were assessed as partially occluded on DSA than on CE-MRA (P = 0.004). There was a good agreement between DSA and CE-MRA for assessment of relevant vessel stenosis (kappa = 0.61); interobserver agreement for MRA was good (kappa = 0.65). CE-MRA detected significantly more patent metatarsal arteries than did DSA (P < 0.001).
Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRA is comparable to DSA for assessment of the pedal vasculature, and is able to delineate significantly more patent vessels without segmental occlusions and more metatarsal arteries than selective DSA.
比较钆贝葡胺(Gd-BOPTA)增强磁共振血管造影(即对比增强磁共振血管造影[CE-MRA])在外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)患者足部血管系统中的表现与选择性数字减影血管造影(DSA)。
22例PAOD患者在1.5T设备上进行前瞻性检查。为进行对比增强,应用0.1 mmol/kg体重的Gd-BOPTA。MRA包括动态成像,采集连续6个数据集。每个数据集的采集时间为24秒,体素大小为1.0×1.0×1.3 mm³。22例患者中有20例接受了选择性DSA检查,2例接受了细针DSA检查。DSA和MRA在7天内完成。图像分析由两名观察者独立进行,评估整体图像质量、运动伪影、小腿远端和足部血管的通畅血管段检测以及跖骨动脉的通畅数量。四周后,对DSA图像进行一致性读片。再过六周后对CE-MRA进行第二次一致性读片。
MRA和DSA的一致性读片显示,MRA的图像质量更高,运动伪影更少(分别为P = 0.021和P = 0.008,符号检验);观察者间对图像质量的一致性良好(kappa = 0.78),对运动伪影的一致性中等(kappa = 0.46)。在检测通畅血管段方面,CE-MRA和DSA之间无差异,一致性程度较高(kappa = 0.89),MRA的观察者间一致性较强(kappa = 0.89)。DSA评估为部分闭塞的血管明显多于CE-MRA(P = 0.004)。在评估相关血管狭窄方面,DSA和CE-MRA之间一致性良好(kappa = 0.61);MRA的观察者间一致性良好(kappa = 0.65)。CE-MRA检测到的通畅跖骨动脉明显多于DSA(P < 0.001)。
Gd-BOPTA增强MRA在评估足部血管系统方面与DSA相当,并且与选择性DSA相比,能够清晰显示更多无节段性闭塞的通畅血管和更多的跖骨动脉。