Wolford George, Newman Sarah E, Miller Michael B, Wig Gagan S
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Dec;58(4):221-8. doi: 10.1037/h0087446.
In a probability-guessing paradigm, participants predict which of two events will occur on each trial. Participants generally frequency match even though frequency matching is nonoptimal with random sequences. The optimal strategy is to guess the most frequent event, maximizing. We hypothesize that frequency matching results from a search for patterns, even in random sequences. Using both callisotomy patients and patients with frontal brain damage, Wolford, Miller, and Gazzaniaga (2000) found frequency matching in the left hemisphere but maximizing in the right hemisphere. In this paper, we show that a secondary task that competes for left hemisphere resources moves the participants toward maximizing but that a right-hemisphere task preserves frequency matching. We also show that a misunderstanding of randomness contributes to frequency matching.
在概率猜测范式中,参与者要预测在每次试验中两个事件中的哪一个会发生。即使频率匹配对于随机序列并非最优,参与者通常仍会进行频率匹配。最优策略是猜测最常出现的事件,以实现最大化。我们假设频率匹配源于对模式的搜索,即使是在随机序列中。通过胼胝体切开术患者和额叶脑损伤患者,沃尔福德、米勒和加扎尼加(2000年)发现左半球存在频率匹配,而右半球则是最大化。在本文中,我们表明,一项争夺左半球资源的次要任务会使参与者趋向于最大化,但一项右半球任务则会保持频率匹配。我们还表明,对随机性的误解导致了频率匹配。