Suppr超能文献

未接种疫苗的实验室工作人员因生物威胁制剂而患职业性疾病的风险。

Risk of occupationally acquired illnesses from biological threat agents in unvaccinated laboratory workers.

作者信息

Rusnak Janice M, Kortepeter Mark G, Hawley Robert J, Anderson Arthur O, Boudreau Ellen, Eitzen Edward

机构信息

Special Immunizations Clinic, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USA.

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(4):281-93. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.281.

Abstract

Many vaccines for bioterrorism agents are investigational and therefore not available (outside of research protocol use) to all at-risk laboratory workers who have begun working with these agents as a result of increased interest in biodefense research. Illness surveillance data archived from the U.S. offensive biological warfare program (from 1943 to 1969) were reviewed to assess the impact of safety measures on disease prevention (including biosafety cabinets [BSCs]) before and after vaccine availability. Most laboratory-acquired infections from agents with higher infective doses (e.g., anthrax, glanders, and plague) were prevented with personal protective measures and safety training alone. Safety measures (including BSCs) without vaccination failed to sufficiently prevent illness from agents with lower infective doses in this high-risk research setting. Infections continued with tularemia (average 15/year), Venezuelan equine encephalitis (1.9/year), and Q fever (3.4/year) but decreased dramatically once vaccinations became available (average of 1, 0.6, and 0 infections per year, respectively). While laboratory-acquired infections are not expected to occur frequently in the current lower-risk biodefense research setting because of further improvements in biosafety equipment and changes in biosafety policies, the data help to define the inherent risks of working with the specific agents of bioterrorism. The data support the idea that research with these agents should be restricted to laboratories with experience in handling highly hazardous agents and where appropriate safety training and precautions can be implemented.

摘要

许多针对生物恐怖主义制剂的疫苗仍处于研究阶段,因此(除研究方案使用外)并非所有因对生物防御研究兴趣增加而开始接触这些制剂的高危实验室工作人员都能获得。回顾了美国进攻性生物战计划(1943年至1969年)存档的疾病监测数据,以评估疫苗可用前后安全措施(包括生物安全柜[BSC])对疾病预防的影响。对于感染剂量较高的制剂(如炭疽、鼻疽和鼠疫)导致的大多数实验室感染,仅通过个人防护措施和安全培训即可预防。在这种高风险研究环境中,没有接种疫苗的安全措施(包括生物安全柜)未能充分预防因感染剂量较低的制剂导致的疾病。兔热病(平均每年15例)、委内瑞拉马脑炎(每年1.9例)和Q热(每年3.4例)的感染仍有发生,但疫苗可用后感染率大幅下降(分别为平均每年1例、0.6例和0例)。虽然由于生物安全设备的进一步改进和生物安全政策的变化,预计在当前风险较低的生物防御研究环境中实验室感染不会频繁发生,但这些数据有助于确定接触特定生物恐怖主义制剂的固有风险。这些数据支持这样一种观点,即对这些制剂的研究应限于有处理高危险制剂经验且能实施适当安全培训和预防措施的实验室。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验