Suppr超能文献

尼日利亚兽医研究设施中的实验室生物安全与生物安保状况

Status of Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity in Veterinary Research Facilities in Nigeria.

作者信息

Odetokun Ismail Ayoade, Jagun-Jubril Afusat Toyin, Onoja Bernard A, Wungak Yiltawe Simwal, Raufu Ibrahim Adisa, Chen Jessica Corron

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.

Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2017 Mar;8(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study determined current status of laboratory biosafety in Nigerian veterinary research facilities.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed to obtain information from researchers across Nigeria from July 2014 to July 2015. Information regarding demographics, knowledge of laboratory biosafety, availability and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), any priority pathogens researched, attitude on and use of standard laboratory practices, and biosafety awareness was obtained using a numeric scoring system. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 74 participants from 19 facilities completed the questionnaire. General knowledge scores ranged from 3 to 28 (out of 28 possible points), with 94.6% of respondents receiving low scores (scores < mean + 1 standard deviation). Very few (17.6%) reported availability or use PPE. Many participants (63.5%) reported no access to biosafety level (BSL)-1-3 facilities. None reported availability of a BSL-4 facility. Knowledge scores pertaining to biosafety management practices ranged from 0 to 14 (out of 14 possible points) with 47.3% of respondents receiving good scores (scores > mean + 1 standard deviation). Only 16.2% of respondents (from four facilities) reported having biosafety officers. Rabies virus was the most researched pathogen (31.1% of respondents). The majority (71.6%) were unaware of laws guiding biosafety. Researchers [odds ratio (OR) = 18.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63, 198.5;  = 0.023], especially in BSL-2 (OR = 258.5; 95% CI: 12.71, 5256;  < 0.001) facility of research institute (OR = 25.0; 95% CI: 5.18, 120.6;  < 0.001), are more likely to have adequate access to and properly utilize biosafety devices and PPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Current knowledge of laboratory biosafety is limited except among a few researchers.

摘要

背景

本研究确定了尼日利亚兽医研究机构实验室生物安全的现状。

方法

2014年7月至2015年7月期间,设计了一份问卷,以从尼日利亚各地的研究人员那里获取信息。使用数字评分系统获取有关人口统计学、实验室生物安全知识、个人防护装备(PPE)的可用性和正确使用情况、所研究的任何优先病原体、对标准实验室操作的态度和使用情况以及生物安全意识的信息。对数据进行描述性统计分析以及单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

来自19个机构的74名参与者完成了问卷。一般知识得分范围为3至28分(满分28分),94.6%的受访者得分较低(得分<平均值+1个标准差)。很少有(17.6%)人报告有PPE可用或使用PPE。许多参与者(63.5%)报告无法使用生物安全1-3级设施。没有人报告有生物安全4级设施。生物安全管理实践的知识得分范围为0至14分(满分14分),47.3%的受访者得分较高(得分>平均值+1个标准差)。只有16.2%的受访者(来自四个机构)报告有生物安全官员。狂犬病病毒是研究最多的病原体(31.1%的受访者)。大多数人(71.6%)不知道指导生物安全的法律。研究人员[优势比(OR)=18.0;95%置信区间(CI):1.63,198.5;P=0.023],尤其是在研究所的生物安全2级设施(OR=258.5;95%CI:12.71,5256;P<0.001)中(OR=25.0;95%CI:5.18,120.6;P<0.001),更有可能充分使用并正确使用生物安全设备和PPE。

结论

除了少数研究人员外,目前实验室生物安全知识有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22cd/5355539/871924cc002e/gr3.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验