Tillmann H L, Wiegand J, Glomb I, Jelineck A, Picchio G, Wedemeyer H, Manns M P
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Z Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;43(1):11-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813429.
The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C virus infection is based on nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HCV-RNA. We evaluated whether total HCV core antigen testing could be a substitute for NAT testing.
Samples from 192 untreated chronic HCV positive patients previously tested for HCV-RNA by four different commercially available assays (SuperQuant, Amplicor HCV Monitor v 1.0 and v 2.0, Quantiplex) were tested for total HCV core antigen using the Ortho trak-C assay (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA). Furthermore, 52 HCV-RNA positive paired serum and plasma samples were analysed. Finally, inter-assay coefficients of variation for core antigen were determined by repeated testing of 59 samples.
172/192 (89.6 %) samples from untreated HCV patients showed positive results with the trak-C assay. Importantly, all but two trak-C positive samples were NAT positive. Only four of the twenty trak-C negative samples tested positive by two NAT assays with viral loads below 30,000 copies/mL. Moreover, HCV core antigen levels correlated significantly with HCV-RNA levels (r > 0.72; p > 0.001), gave consistent results in paired serum and plasma samples (r = 0.991), and showed a very low inter-assay variability (r = 0.943) independent of genotype.
Based on the performance characteristics, easiness of use, and potential lower cost of the core Ag assay, we propose an alternative testing algorithm for establishing the diagnosis of chronic HCV infection in which the trak-C assay could substitute for NAT as the first choice for detection of HCV viraemia in anti-HCV positive individuals. NAT would only be necessary in rare cases with low viral load.
慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的诊断基于丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸(HCV-RNA)的核酸检测(NAT)。我们评估了总HCV核心抗原检测是否可替代NAT检测。
采用美国新泽西州拉里坦市奥瑟临床诊断公司(Ortho Clinical Diagnostics)的奥瑟trak-C检测法(Ortho trak-C assay),对192例未经治疗的慢性HCV阳性患者的样本进行总HCV核心抗原检测,这些患者之前通过四种不同的商用检测方法(SuperQuant、Amplicor HCV Monitor v 1.0和v 2.0、Quantiplex)检测过HCV-RNA。此外,对52份HCV-RNA阳性的配对血清和血浆样本进行了分析。最后,通过对59份样本的重复检测确定了核心抗原检测的批间变异系数。
192例未经治疗的HCV患者中有172例(89.6%)样本的trak-C检测呈阳性。重要的是,除两份trak-C阳性样本外,其余所有样本的NAT检测均为阳性。20份trak-C阴性样本中只有4份通过两种NAT检测呈阳性,病毒载量低于30,000拷贝/毫升。此外,HCV核心抗原水平与HCV-RNA水平显著相关(r > 0.72;p > 0.001),在配对的血清和血浆样本中结果一致(r = 0.991),并且批间变异非常低(r = 0.943),与基因型无关。
基于核心抗原检测的性能特征、易用性以及潜在的低成本,我们提出了一种用于慢性HCV感染诊断的替代检测算法,其中trak-C检测可替代NAT,作为抗HCV阳性个体中HCV病毒血症检测的首选方法。仅在病毒载量低的罕见情况下才需要进行NAT检测。