Nishibayashi Yoshiaki, Milton Marilyn Daisy, Inada Youichi, Yoshikawa Masato, Wakiji Issei, Hidai Masanobu, Uemura Sakae
Department of Energy and Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8510, Japan.
Chemistry. 2005 Feb 18;11(5):1433-51. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400833.
The scope and limitations of the ruthenium-catalyzed propargylic substitution reaction of propargylic alcohols with heteroatom-centered nucleophiles are presented. Oxygen-, nitrogen-, and phosphorus-centered nucleophiles such as alcohols, amines, amides, and phosphine oxide are available for this catalytic reaction. Only the thiolate-bridged diruthenium complexes can work as catalysts for this reaction. Results of some stoichiometric and catalytic reactions indicate that the catalytic propargylic substitution reaction proceeds via an allenylidene complex formed in situ, whereby the attack of nucleophiles to the allenylidene C(gamma) atom is a key step. Investigation of the relative rate constants for the reaction of propargylic alcohols with several para-substituted anilines reveals that the attack of anilines on the allenylidene C(gamma) atom is not involved in the rate-determining step and rather the acidity of conjugated anilines of an alkynyl complex, which is formed after the attack of aniline on the C(gamma) atom, is considered to be the most important factor to determine the rate of this catalytic reaction. The key point to promote this catalytic reaction by using the thiolate-bridged diruthenium complexes is considered to be the ease of the ligand exchange step between a vinylidene ligand on the diruthenium complexes and another propargylic alcohol in the catalytic cycle. The reason why only the thiolate-bridged diruthenium complexes promote the ligand exchange step more easily with respect to other monoruthenium complexes in this catalytic reaction should be that one Ru moiety, which is not involved in the allenylidene formation, works as an electron pool or a mobile ligand to another Ru site. The catalytic procedure presented here provides a versatile, direct, and one-step method for propargylic substitution of propargylic alcohols in contrast to the so far well-known stoichiometric and stepwise Nicholas reaction.
本文介绍了钌催化的炔丙醇与以杂原子为中心的亲核试剂的炔丙基取代反应的范围和局限性。以氧、氮和磷为中心的亲核试剂,如醇、胺、酰胺和氧化膦,均可用于此催化反应。只有硫醇盐桥联的二钌配合物可作为该反应的催化剂。一些化学计量反应和催化反应的结果表明,催化炔丙基取代反应通过原位形成的亚联烯基配合物进行,亲核试剂对亚联烯基C(γ)原子的进攻是关键步骤。对炔丙醇与几种对位取代苯胺反应的相对速率常数的研究表明,苯胺对亚联烯基C(γ)原子的进攻不参与速率决定步骤,相反,苯胺进攻C(γ)原子后形成的炔基配合物的共轭苯胺的酸度被认为是决定该催化反应速率的最重要因素。使用硫醇盐桥联的二钌配合物促进该催化反应的关键点被认为是在催化循环中二钌配合物上的亚乙烯基配体与另一种炔丙醇之间的配体交换步骤的难易程度。在该催化反应中,只有硫醇盐桥联的二钌配合物相对于其他单钌配合物更容易促进配体交换步骤的原因应该是,一个不参与亚联烯基形成的Ru部分作为电子库或可移动配体作用于另一个Ru位点。与迄今为止广为人知的化学计量和分步尼古拉斯反应相比,本文提出的催化方法为炔丙醇的炔丙基取代提供了一种通用、直接的一步法。