Raj Hans, Bakshi G S, Tiwari R R, Anand Ashima, Paintal A S
Department of Electrophysiology, Vidyasagar Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, New Delhi 110065, India.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005 Jan 15;145(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2004.09.001.
In order to examine, whether the lobeline-induced cough is a true reflex or a voluntary effort to get rid of its irritating sensations in the upper respiratory tract, we systematically studied the cough response to lobeline, of subjects who were unable to make conscious discriminations i.e. were either comatose (n=4) or anaesthetized (n=5). 8 microg/kg lobeline injected into the right atrium of one and 29 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) into another evenly and spontaneously breathing comatose subject produced a cough after 4s and 12s, respectively. Cough was repeatable and showed a dose response relationship i.e., its latency decreasing and its duration/intensity increasing with the dose. In a third subject, capable only of weak spontaneous respiration, a relatively high dose injected into the right atrium (44 microg/kg) generated a pronounced cough-like respiratory movement superimposed on the artificial ventilation and also during the apnoea after disconnecting the pump. No respiratory response was evoked in a fourth subject who had no evidence of brainstem reflexes. In five normals, cough was elicited with a mean dose of 35+/-5 microg/kg i.v. (latency 14+/-2 s; duration 10+/-3 s). After thiopental anaesthesia, injecting 41+/-7 microg/kg produced a cough within 13+/-2 s that lasted for 12+/-2 s. It may be noted that neither the later dose nor the latency or duration of cough that it produced were significantly different from the pre anaesthesia values (P>0.05). These two sets of results show unequivocally that the lobeline-induced cough is evoked reflexly; its magnitude in the conscious state could vary by subjective influences. We discuss the likelihood of its origin from juxtapulmonary capillary receptors.
为了研究洛贝林引起的咳嗽是真正的反射,还是为摆脱上呼吸道刺激感而做出的自主努力,我们系统地研究了无法进行有意识辨别(即昏迷,n = 4;或麻醉,n = 5)的受试者对洛贝林的咳嗽反应。向一名均匀自主呼吸的昏迷受试者右心房注射8微克/千克洛贝林,向另一名均匀自主呼吸的昏迷受试者静脉注射29微克/千克洛贝林,分别在4秒和12秒后引发咳嗽。咳嗽具有重复性,并呈现剂量反应关系,即随着剂量增加,潜伏期缩短,持续时间/强度增加。在第三名仅能进行微弱自主呼吸的受试者中,向其右心房注射相对高剂量(44微克/千克)的洛贝林后,在人工通气期间以及断开泵后的呼吸暂停期间,均产生了叠加在人工通气上的明显的类似咳嗽的呼吸运动。在第四名无脑干反射证据的受试者中未诱发呼吸反应。在五名正常人中,静脉注射平均剂量35±5微克/千克的洛贝林可引发咳嗽(潜伏期14±2秒;持续时间10±3秒)。硫喷妥钠麻醉后,注射41±7微克/千克的洛贝林在13±2秒内引发咳嗽,持续12±2秒。需要注意的是,该剂量以及它所引发的咳嗽的潜伏期或持续时间与麻醉前的值均无显著差异(P>0.05)。这两组结果明确表明,洛贝林引起的咳嗽是反射性诱发的;在清醒状态下其程度可能受主观因素影响而有所不同。我们讨论了其起源于肺旁毛细血管感受器的可能性。