Ivanoiu Adrian, Adam Stephane, Van der Linden Martial, Salmon Eric, Juillerat Anne-Claude, Mulligan Reinhild, Seron Xavier
Department of Neurology, Memory Clinic and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Center, Saint Luc University Hospital, University of Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
J Neurol. 2005 Jan;252(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0597-2.
Free delayed recall is considered the memory measure with the greatest sensitivity for the early diagnosis of dementia. However, its specificity for dementia could be lower, as deficits other than those of pure memory might account for poor performance in this difficult and effortful task. Cued recall is supposed to allow a better distinction between poor memory due to concurrent factors and impairments related to the neurodegenerative process. The available cued recall tests suffer from a ceiling effect. This is a prospective, longitudinal study aiming to assess the utility of a new memory test based on cued recall that avoids the ceiling effect in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Twenty-five patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 22 probable AD patients (NINCDS-ADRDA) at a mild stage, 22 elderly patients with subjective memory complaints (SMC) and 38 normal age-matched controls took part in the study. The patients underwent a thorough cognitive evaluation and the recommended screening procedure for the diagnosis of dementia. All patients were re-examined 12-18 months later. A newly devised delayed cued recall test using semantic cues (The RI48 Test) was compared with three established memory tests: the Ten Word-List Recall from CERAD, the "Doors" and the "Shapes" Tests from "The Doors and People Test Battery". Forty-four % of the MCI patients fulfilled criteria for probable AD at follow-up. The RI48 Test classified correctly 88% of the MCI and SMC participants and was the best predictor of the status of MCI and mild AD as well as the outcome of the MCI patients. Poor visual memory was the second best predictor of those MCI patients who evolved to AD. A cued recall test which avoids the ceiling effect is at least as good as the delayed free recall tests in the early detection of AD.
自由延迟回忆被认为是对痴呆早期诊断敏感性最高的记忆测量方法。然而,它对痴呆的特异性可能较低,因为除了单纯记忆缺陷外,其他缺陷也可能导致在这项困难且费力的任务中表现不佳。线索回忆被认为可以更好地区分由并发因素导致的记忆不佳和与神经退行性过程相关的损伤。现有的线索回忆测试存在天花板效应。这是一项前瞻性纵向研究,旨在评估一种基于线索回忆的新记忆测试在阿尔茨海默病(AD)早期诊断中的效用,该测试可避免天花板效应。25名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者、22名轻度阶段的可能AD患者(NINCDS - ADRDA)、22名有主观记忆主诉(SMC)的老年患者和38名年龄匹配的正常对照参与了该研究。患者接受了全面的认知评估以及推荐的痴呆诊断筛查程序。所有患者在12 - 18个月后再次接受检查。将一种新设计的使用语义线索的延迟线索回忆测试(RI48测试)与三种既定的记忆测试进行比较:CERAD的十个单词列表回忆测试、“门与人物测试电池”中的“门”测试和“形状”测试。44%的MCI患者在随访时符合可能AD的标准。RI48测试正确分类了88%的MCI和SMC参与者,并且是MCI和轻度AD状态以及MCI患者预后的最佳预测指标。视觉记忆差是那些发展为AD的MCI患者的第二好预测指标。一种避免天花板效应的线索回忆测试在AD的早期检测中至少与延迟自由回忆测试一样好。