Suppr超能文献

使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表、加州言语学习测验第三版及特定项目缺陷法对人工耳蜗植入使用者延迟回忆能力的检测:初步结果

Examining Delayed Recall in Cochlear Implant Users Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, California Verbal Learning Test, Third Edition, and Item Specific Deficit Approach: Preliminary Results.

作者信息

Brumer Nadav, Elkins Elizabeth, Parada Jennifer, Hillyer Jake, Parbery-Clark Alexandra

机构信息

Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Psychology, Bellevue College, Bellevue, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 4;12:749045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749045. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Recent studies using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) suggest delayed recall is challenging for cochlear implant (CI) users. To better understand the underlying processes associated with delayed recall in CI users, we administered the MoCA and the California Verbal Learning Test, Third Edition (CVLT-3), which provides a more comprehensive assessment of delayed recall ability. The MoCA and CVLT-3 were administered to 18 high-performing CI users. For the CVLT-3, both the traditional scoring and a newer scoring method, the Item-Specific Deficit Approach (ISDA), were employed. The original MoCA score and MoCA delayed recall subtest score did not relate to performance on any CVLT-3 measures regardless of scoring metric applied (i.e., traditional or ISDA). Encoding performance for both the CVLT-3 and ISDA were related. Consolidation, which is only distinctly defined by the ISDA, related to CVLT-3 cued delay recall performance but not free delay recall performance. Lastly, ISDA retrieval only related to CVLT-3 measures when modified. Performance on the MoCA and CVLT-3 in a high performing CI patient population were not related. We demonstrate that the ISDA can be successfully applied to CI users for the quantification and characterization of delayed recall ability; however, future work addressing lower performing CI users, and comparing to normal hearing controls is needed to determine the extent of potential translational applications. Our work also indicates that a modified ISDA retrieval score may be beneficial for evaluating CI users although additional work addressing the clinical relevance of this is still needed.

摘要

最近使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的研究表明,延迟回忆对人工耳蜗(CI)使用者来说具有挑战性。为了更好地理解与CI使用者延迟回忆相关的潜在过程,我们实施了MoCA和加州言语学习测验第三版(CVLT-3),后者能更全面地评估延迟回忆能力。对18名表现优异的CI使用者进行了MoCA和CVLT-3测试。对于CVLT-3,采用了传统评分方法和一种更新的评分方法——项目特定缺陷法(ISDA)。无论应用何种评分指标(即传统评分或ISDA),原始MoCA分数和MoCA延迟回忆子测验分数均与CVLT-3的任何测量指标表现无关。CVLT-3和ISDA的编码表现相关。巩固过程(仅由ISDA明确界定)与CVLT-3线索延迟回忆表现相关,但与自由延迟回忆表现无关。最后,仅在经过修改后,ISDA检索才与CVLT-3测量指标相关。在表现优异的CI患者群体中,MoCA和CVLT-3的表现无关。我们证明,ISDA可成功应用于CI使用者,以量化和描述延迟回忆能力;然而,未来需要针对表现较差的CI使用者开展工作,并与正常听力对照组进行比较,以确定潜在转化应用的程度。我们的研究还表明,修改后的ISDA检索分数可能有助于评估CI使用者,尽管仍需要开展更多工作来探讨其临床相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f784/8599833/5dd1c131857e/fpsyg-12-749045-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验